- Our College
- Academics
- Student Services
- Public Reports
- Forum
- Library
- Quick Access
AP Full Official:Certificate of Achievement in Trial Counselors-YC
Campus: Yap Campus
Completed by: Joy Guarin
AP Review Submission Date:March 31, 2014
AR Review Cycle: 2012-2013
At the completion of Secretarial Certificate the student will be able to::
In 1996,Certificate of achievement program for trial counselors is approved for implementation pending availability of funding. The program started with 1 student in fall of 2010 at Yap campus.
This certificate program provides training opportunities for current as well as aspiring and upcoming trial counselors to improve their skills and competency and to prepare them to be effective decision makers in their respective courts, It also provides for networking and sharing among trial counselors.
High School graduates and General Educational Development (GED) certificate holders who are not accepted into or are not interested in a degree program may apply for admission into an entry level certificate of achievement program.
Applicants with significantly low scores are ineligible for admission. Other certificates of achievement program are offered when criteria for offering the program are met. Admissions requirements vary with the program. Application forms are available at Yap campus.
The following are the major requirements:
Program Requirements
Major Requirements:....................31 credits
Law 200 Legal Research and Writing (3)
Law 210 Criminal Procedure (3)
Law 215 Criminal Law (3)
Law 220 Torts (3)
Law 224 Contracts (3)
Law 228Evidence (3)
Law 232 Constitutional Law (3)
Law 236 Appellate and Civil Procedure/Jurisdiction (4)
Law 238 Real Property (3)
Law 240 Trial Practice Internship (3)
Spring 2011 | Fall 2011 | Spring 2012 | Fall 2012 | Spring 2013 | Fall 2013 | Total |
12/td> | 8 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 33 |
Spring 2012 | Fall 2012 | Spring 2013 | Fall 2013 | Total |
8 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 13 |
Courses Number | Number of section | Course Enrollment | Semester |
Law 210 | 1 | 9 | Spring 2012 |
Law< 232/td> | 1 | 9 | Spring 2012 |
Law 228 | 1 | 5 | Fall 2012 |
Law 240 | 1 | 4 | 2012 |
Name of Faculty | FullTime/Parttime | Degrees Held | Rank | |
Jeremiah Luther | Part time | Doctor of Jurisprudence | Instructor | |
Matthew Mannisto | Part time | JD. Litigation | Instructor | |
JD. Litigation | Part time | BA, JD,LLM | Instructor | Major courses |
Name of Faculty | Number of Students | Faculty Student Ratio |
3 | 13 | 1:4 |
Course No. | Instructor Name | No. of Students Enrolled | No. of stu-dents with "W" | No. of Students Successful of SLO 1 | SLO 2 | SLO 3 | SLO 4 | SLO 5 | SLO 6 |
Law 228 | Douglas Jennings | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | |
Law 240 | Jeremiah Luther | 4 | 0 | 4 |
Note: Used the old course outline using general objectives:
PSLO Assessment Report Summary (PAS of Trial Counselors Program, 2012-2013)
What we looked at:
The Trial Counseling certificate, assessment focused on PSLOs 1, 2, 6, 7, 9, and 10. Listed below are the results for each of the PSLOs.
What we found:
What we are planning to work on:
recommendation by the instructor is to have two semesters of legal research class instead of one, prior to taking this course. An additional recommendation is to purchase a package through CALL.org, a computer-assistant learning program used by nearly every law school in the United States. The package costs around $250.00/year.
Recommendations for students:
Term | No.of Enrolled Students(Yap) | Overall number of students enrolled (Chuuk,Pohnpei and Yap) | Percentage(%) |
Spring 2011 | 12 | 26 | 46.2% |
Fall 2011 | 8 | 35 | 23% |
Spring 2012 | 8 | 36 | 22.2% |
Fall 2012 | 5 | 24 | 20.8% |
Spring 2013 | 0 | 15 | 0% |
Fall 2013 | 0 | 23 | % |
Term | No.of Enrolled Students(Yap) | Total enrollment of YAP campus | Percentage(%) |
Spring 2011 | 75 | 222 | 34% |
Fall 2011 | 54 | 372 | 15% |
Spring 2012 | 54 | 422 | 13% |
Fall 2012 | 27 | 237 | 11% |
Spring 2013 | 0 | 290 | 0% |
Fall 2013 | 0 | 207 | 0% |
Total | 210 |
Term | Section | Enroll/Max | Enrollment | EnrollRatio(3/2) | AvgClassSize(3/1) |
Spring 2012 | 2 | 40 | 18 | 45% | 9 |
Fall 2012 | 2 | 40 | 9 | 22.5% | 5 |
Spring 2013 | |||||
Fall 2013 | |||||
Average | 7 |
Course No. | Instructor Name | No.of Students Enrolled | No.of Students with "W" | Number of Students with a grade of F | Number of students completed the course | Completion rate(6/3) |
Law 210 | Jeremiah Luther | 9 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 89% |
Law 232 | Matthew Mannisto | 9 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 100% |
Total Average Rate | 18 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 94.5% |
Course No. | Instructor Name | No.of Students Enrolled | No.of Students with "W" | Number of Students with a grade of F | Number of students completed the course | Completion rate(6/3) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Law 228 | Douglas Jennings | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 100% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Law 240 | Jeremiah Luther | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 100% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total/Average Rate | 9 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 100% |
Rate of students with W- 3.7%; Rate of students with a grade of F- 0%; General completion rate- 97.25%
Number of New students , Full time for Fall 2012 | Same students, Spring 2013 | Persistence Rate(%) |
None |
Number of New students , Full time for Fall 2012 | Same students, Fall 2013 | Retention Rate(%) |
None |
N/A
Term | Number of Graduates |
Spring 2012 | 0 |
Fall 2012 | 5 |
Spring 2013 | 0 |
Fall 2013 | 0 | Total | 5 |
At the present tuition rate of $105 per credit the total seat cost per student completing this program is $3,255 The table below shows detailed information.
Classes | Credits | CPC | CPS |
Law 200 | 3 | $105 | $315 |
Law 210 | 3 | $105 | $315 |
Law 215 | 3 | $105 | $315 |
Law 220 | 3 | $105 | $315 |
Law 224 | 3 | $105 | $315 |
Law 228 | 3 | $105 | $315 |
Law 232 | 3 | $105 | $315 |
Law 236 | 4 | $105 | $420 |
Law 238 | 3 | $105 | $315 |
Law 240 | 3 | $105 | $315 |
Total | 34 | $3,255/b> |
CPC- Cost Per Credit; CPS- Cost Per Student
None
A survey was conducted on selected behaviors of instructors for each class at the end of every
semester. There were 15 items in the survey and students were asked to rate each class according to these items on a scale of 1 to 5; 1 being never , 2 is rarely, 3 as sometimes, 4 is usually and 5 being always.
The following are the items used in the survey
1-Keeps regular schedule every class day. 2-Shows interest in the subject. 3-Gives individual help as needed 4-Avails self for student conference.5- Welcomes questions, suggestions, and discussions from students 6- Shows interest and respect for students.7- Helps the students in meeting individual learning needs.8- Uses classroom/lab time fully 9-Provides clear directions for assignments and instruction. 10-Grades fairly.11- Makes the purpose of the course clear. 12-Talks clearly and at an easy-to-follow speed.13- Paces the lessons well with activity as well as lecture. 14 Makes the course interesting.15- Textbook was appropriate and helpful.
Students' Satisfaction Survey Results(Weighted Means) Legend:
N-Number of students; AWM Average Weighted Mean; D-Descriptive Equivalent; U-Usually; A-Always
The table below shows detailed information on the students’ satisfaction survey during Fall 2012.
Spring 2013Courses | N | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | AWM | D |
Law 228 | 5 | 4.8 | 4.6 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.8 | 4.8 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.7 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 4.5 | 4.9 | 4.7 | A | |
Law 240 | 4 | 4 | 4.3 | 4.8 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 3.5 | 3.8 | 4 | 4.3 | 4 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.5 | 4.5 | 4.2 | A |
General Weighted Mean 4.45
Descriptive Equivalent Always
1 graduate at National Campus from Yap.
Graduate Number | Working? | Locaiton | In School? | Locaiton |
1 | Yes | AYUW Comm. | No | |
2 | No | Yes | BA, FIji | |
3 | No | Yes | USP, Law Fiji | |
4 | Yes | COM-FSM | No | |
5 | Yes | Yap Social Security | No |
N/A
None
Finding
This section provides discussion of information discovered as a result of the evaluation such as problems or concerns with the program and what part of the program is working well and meeting expectation.
Recommendation:
This section provides recommendations from the program on what to do to improve or enhance the quality of program and course learning outcomes as well as program goals and objectives. This section should also include suggestions that describe how the program might be able to create opportunities for a better program in the future. Some examples are exploring alternate delivery mechanisms, forming external partnerships, or realigning with other programs.
This website and all COM-FSM Internet based services are best viewed with Firefox 3.0 or better.
© Copyright 2020 College of Micronesia-FSM | Site Disclaimer
P. O. Box 159, Kolonia, Pohnpei, 96941 - (691) 320-2480
College of Micronesia-FSM is accredited by the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges,
Western Association of Schools and Colleges, 428 J Street., Suite 400 Sacramento, CA 95814, (415) 506-0234,
an institutional accrediting body recognized by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation and the U.S. Department of Education.
Additional information about accreditation, including the filing of complaints against member institutions, can be found at: www.accjc.org