- Our College
- Academics
- Student Services
- Public Reports
- Forum
- Library
- Quick Access
AP Full Official:Certificate of Achievement in Agriculture and Food Technology
Campus: Yap Campus
Completed by: Joy Guarin
AP Review Submission Date:March 31 2014
AR Review Cycle: 2012- 2013
Program Learning outcomes
(Upon successful completion of this certificate, students will be able to)
In year 3000, Certificate of achievement program in agriculture and food technology was added . Fall 3008 upon opening the program again it started out with 10 students with the assistance of the US Department of Agriculture. At Yap campus it started during Summer of 2010 with 2 students.
Agriculture and Food Technology Certificate of Achievement offers courses that should be and are aligned with the degree program offered at COM-FSM National Campus. The program focuses on training of students to continue on for the degree program it also prepares student for the work force. Students will be able to take on jobs such as technicians or farming depending on their choices for the future.
Admission to Agriculture and Food Technology certificate is determined by the COMET results. High school graduates/equivalent: COMET results in respective programs.
(High school graduate or GED certificate holder. Applicants must take the COM-FSM Entrance Test (COMET) and be accepted by the Admissions Board. Acceptance by the Admissions Board is based on the applicant’s score on the COMET and other criteria as defined by the Admissions Board.)
The following are the major requirements:
Program Requirements
General Education Requirements....................13 credits
CA 100 Basic Computer Applications (3)
ESL 050 Technical English 050 (3)
MS 104 Technical Math I (4)
SC 098 Survey of Science (3))
Technical Requirements..........................21 or 22 credits
AG 084 Basic Crop Production (4)
AG 096 Field Internship (5)
Plus a minimum of 12 credits from the following:
AG 086 Micro-Propagation (4)
AG 088 Landscaping (3)
AG 090 Principles of Food Processing (3)
AG 092 Swine and Poultry Production (3)
AG 094 Farm Management and Marketing (3)
TTotal Requirements.........................34 -35Credits
Spring 2011 | Fall 2011 | Spring 2012 | Summer 2012 | Fall 2012 | Spring 2013 | Summer 2013 | Fall 2013 | Total |
7 | 17 | 9 | 3 | 21 | 23 | 16 | 26 | 122 |
Spring 2012 | Summer 2012 | Fall 2012 | Spring 2013 | Summer 2013 | Fall 2013 | Total |
9 | 3 | 21 | 23 | 16 | 26 | 98 |
* Number of students enrolled for Spring and Summer of 2012 are below 10. The summer enrollment for Summer 2012 is for Field internship.
Courses Number | Number of Section | Course Enrollment | Semester |
AG 88 | 1 | 12 | Spring 2012 |
AG 90 | 1 | 11 | Spring 2012 |
AG 92 | 1 | 5 | Spring 2012 |
AG 94 | 1 | 11 | Spring 2012 |
AG 84 | 1 | 18 | Fall 2012 |
AG 88 | 1 | 11 | Fall 2012 |
AG 92 | 1 | 17 | Fall 2012 |
AG 96 | 1 | 3 | Fall 2012 |
AG 86 | 1 | 19 | Spring 2013 |
AG 90 | 1 | 19 | Spring 2013 |
AG 94 | 1 | 18 | Spring 2013 |
AG 96 | 1 | 2 | Spring 2013 |
AG 84 | 1 | 16 | Fall 2013 |
AG 82 | 1 | 14 | Fall 2013 |
AG 96 | 1 | 5 | Fall 2013 |
*11 out of 15 courses offered for the 4 semesters have number of students above 10 except AG 96 and AG 92. Take note that AG 96 is an internship course.
Name of Faculty | Full time/Part time | Degrees Held | Rank |
Joy Guarin | Part time | DVM.,MS, PhD | Professor |
Murukesan Krishnapillai | Part Time | BS,MS, PhD. | |
Steven Young Uhk | Part Time | BA, MA units | Instructor |
Francis Ruegorong | Part Time | BA, MA | Assistant Professor |
Peter Tairuwepiy | Part Time | BA | Instructor |
Name of Faculty | Number of Students | Faculty Student Ratio |
5 | 98 | 1:20 |
Course | Instructor Name | No.of Students Enrolled | No.of Students with "W" | No.of Students successful of SLO 1 | No.of Students successful of SLO 2 | No.of Students successful of SLO 3 | No.of Students successful of SLO 4 | No.of Students successful of SLO 5 | No.of Students successful of SLO 6 |
AG 84 | Steven Young Uhk | 18 | 2 | 12 | 14 | 15 | |||
AG0 88 | Peter Tairuwepiv | 11 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
AG 92 | Joy Guarin | 17 | 2 | 15 | 14 | 14 | 15 | 14 | |
AG 96 | Francis Ruegorong | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
Course | Instructor Name | No.of Students Enrolled | No.of Students with "W" | No.of Students successful of SLO 1 | No.of Students successful of SLO 2 | No.of Students successful of SLO 3 | No.of Students successful of SLO 4 | No.of Students successful of SLO 5 | No.of Students successful of SLO 6 |
AG 86 | Steven Young Uhk | 19 | 0 | 18 | 18 | 18 | 18 | ||
AG 90 | Joy Guarin | 19 | 1 | 18 | 18 | 10 | |||
AG 94 | Francis Ruegonrong | 18 | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | |||
AG 96 | Murukesan K. | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
Course | Instructor Name | No.of Students Enrolled | No.of Students with "W" | No.of Students successful of SLO 1 | No.of Students successful of SLO 2 | No.of Students successful of SLO 3 | No.of Students successful of SLO 4 | No.of Students successful of SLO 5 | No.of Students successful of SLO 6 |
AG 84 | Steven Young Uhk | 19\6 | 0 | 12 | 11 | 16 | |||
AG 92 | Joy Guarin | 14 | 0 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 |
AG 96 | Francis Ruegonrong | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
PSLO Assessment Report Summary (Yap Campus).
What we looked at:
The Agriculture and Food Technology certificate, assessment focused on PSLOs 1,2, 3, 4, and 6 using Pre-Post Test scores. Listed below are the results for each of the PSLOs. Note that no differential statistics was used to determine if there is a significant difference between Pre and Post test scores.
What we found:
PSLO 1. 16 students got an average Pre Test score of 35 and Post test score of 64 with a difference of 29 during Fall 2012 under the related course Basic Crop production.
PSLO 2. 19 students got an average Pre Test score of 36 and Post test score of 58 with a difference of 22 during Spring 2013 under the related course Farm Management and Marketing.
PSLO 3. 18 students got an average Pre-Test score of 64 and Post test score of 73 with a difference of 9 during Spring 2013 under the related course Principles of Food Processing.
PSLO 4. 14 students got an average Pre-test score of 62 and Post Test score of 78 with a difference of 16 during Fall 2012 under the related course Swine and Poultry Production.
PSLO 5. 19 students got an average of Pre-Test score of 25 and Post test score of 60 with a difference of 35 during Spring 2013 under the related course Micropropagation.
PSLO 6. 11 students got an average of Pre-test score of 71 and Post test score of 80 with a difference of 9 during Fall 2012 under the related course Landscaping.
What we are planning to work on:
To continue improve on the post test scores by an item analysis of all the questions given in the pre-test by the instructor with the purpose of identifying what topics the students need to know more. These topics should be given emphasis during the lecture. Item analysis workshop can be scheduled before the start of the semester.
Recommendations for students:
Attend class regularly and be responsible for their own learning.
Communicate course concerns with their instructors.
Term | Bo. of Enrolled Students(YAP) | Overall number of students enrolled (Kosrae,Pohnpei and Yap) | Percentage |
Spring 2012 | 9 | 109 | 12% |
Fall 2012 | 21 | 145 | 15% |
Spring 2013 | 23 | 131 | 15% |
Fall 2013 | 26 | 170 | 15% |
Term | Bo. of Enrolled Students(YAP) | Overall number of students enrolled (Kosrae,Pohnpei and Yap) | Percentage |
Spring 2012 | 96 | 1202 | 8% |
Fall 2012 | 256 | 1621 | 16% |
Spring 2013 | 299 | 1404 | 21% |
Fall 2013 | 274 | 1711 | 16% |
Average | 231 |
Term | Section | Enroll/Max | Enrollment | Enroll/Ratio(3?2) | Average Ckass Size(3/1) |
Spring 2012 | 1 | ||||
Fall 2012 | 4 | 80 | 45 | 56.25a% | 11 |
Spring 2013 | 4 | 110 | 60 | 54.5% | 15 |
Fall 2013 | 3 | 56 | 35 | 62.5% | 12 |
Course No. | Instructor Name | No. of Students Enrolled | No. of Students with "W" | No. of Students with a grade of F | No. of Students completed the course | Completion Rate(6/3) |
AG 88 | Francis Ruegorong | 12 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 75 |
AG 90 | Peter Tairuwepir | 11 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 100 |
AG 92 | Joy Guarin | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 100 |
AG 94 | Peter Tairuwepiv | 11 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 100 |
Total Average Rate | 39 | 0 | 3 | 36 | 94% |
Course No. | Instructor Name | No. of Students Enrolled | No. of Students with "W" | No. of Students with a grade of F | No. of Students completed the course | Completion Rate(6/3) |
AG 84 | Steven Young Uhk | 18 | 2 | 1 | 15 | 83.33 |
AG 88 | Peter Tairuwepiy | 11 | 2 | 0 | 9 | 82 |
AG 92 | Joy Guarin | 17 | 2 | 1 | 14 | 82.4 |
AG 96 | Francis Ruegorong | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 100 |
Total/Average Rate | 49 | 6 | 2 | 38 | 87% |
Course No. | Instructor Name | No. of Students Enrolled | No. of Students with "W" | No. of Students with a grade of F | No. of Students completed the course | Completion Rate(6/3) |
AG 86 | Steven Young Uhk | 19 | 0 | 1 | 18 | 95 |
AG 90 | Joy Guarin | 19 | 1 | 0 | 18 | 95 |
AG 94 | Francis Ruegorong | 18 | 1 | 5 | 12 | 67 |
AG 96 | Murukesan K. | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 100 |
Total/Average Rate | 58 | 2 | 6 | 50 | 89% |
Course No. | Instructor Name | No. of Students Enrolled | No. of Students with "W" | No. of Students with a grade of F | No. of Students completed the course | Completion Rate(6/3) |
AG 96 | Francis Ruegorong | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 50 |
Course No. | Instructor Name | No. of Students Enrolled | No. of Students with "W" | No. of Students with a grade of F | No. of Students completed the course | Completion Rate(6/3) |
AG 84 | Steven Young Uhk | 16 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 100 |
AG 92 | Joy Guarin | 14 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 100 |
AG 96 | Francis Ruegorong | 5 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 100 |
Total Average Rate | 35 | 0 | 0 | 35 | 100% |
Number of New students , Full time for Fall 2012 | Same students, Spring 2013 | Persistence Rate(%) |
9 | 7 | 78% |
Number of New students , Full time for Fall 2012 | Same students, Spring 2013 | Retention Rate(%) |
9 | 6 | 67% |
N/A
Term | Number of Graduates |
Spring 2012 | 0 |
Fall 2012 | 4 |
Spring 2013 | 1 |
Summer 2013 | 1 |
Fall 2013 | 0 |
Total | 6 |
At the present tuition rate of $105 per credit the total seat cost per student completing this program is $3990. The table below shows detailed information.
Classes | Credits | CPC | CPS |
CA 100 | 3 | $105 | $315 |
ESL 050 | 3 | $105 | $315 |
MS 104 | 4 | $105 | $420 |
SC 098 | 3 | $105 | $315 |
AG 084 | 4 | $105 | $420 |
AG 096 | 5 | $105 | $525/td> |
AG 086 | 4 | $105 | $420 |
AG 88 | 3 | $105 | $315 |
AG 90 | 3 | $105 | $315 |
AG 92 | 3 | $105 | $315 |
AG 94 | 3 | $105 | $315 |
TOTAL | 38 | $3990 |
Total Requirements...............................34-35 Credits
N/A
Students were given a satisfaction survey for each class at the end of every semester. There were 15 items in the survey and students were asked to rate each class according to these items on a scale of 1 to 5; 1 being never , 2 is rarely, 3 as sometimes, 4 is usually and 5 being always. The table below shows detailed information on the students’ satisfaction survey from Spring 2013 to Fall 2013.
Students’ Satisfaction Survey Results(Weighted Means)
Legend:
The following are the items used in the survey
1-Keeps regular schedule every class day. 2-Shows interest in the subject. 3-Gives individual help as needed 4-Avails self for student conference.5- Welcomes questions, suggestions, and discussions from students 6- Shows interest and respect for students.7-Shows interest and respect for students.8- Helps the students in meeting individual learning needs.9- Uses classroom/lab time fully 10-Provides clear directions for assignments and instruction. 11-Grades fairly.12- Makes the purpose of the course clear. 13-Talks clearly and at an easy-to-follow speed.14- Paces the lessons well with activity as well as lecture. 15 Makes the course interesting.16- Textbook was appropriate and helpful.
N-Number of students; AWM Average Weighted Mean; D – Descriptive Equivalent; U- Usually; A- Always
Courses | N | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | AWM | D |
AG 92 | 9 | 4.9 | 4.3 | 4.1 | 3.9 | 4.6 | 4.3 | 4 | 5 | 4.7 | 4.9 | 4.7 | 3.8 | 4.7 | 4.1 | 4.4 | A |
Courses | N | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | AWM | D |
AG 86 | 13 | 4.2 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.4 | 4.7 | 4.9 | 4.6 | 4.5 | 4.8 | 4.9 | 4.7 | 4.6 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 4.8 | 4.7 | A |
AG 90 | 12 | 4.9 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.2 | 4.8 | 4.2 | 4.3 | 4.3 | 4.4 | 4.2 | 4.6 | 4.6 | 4.8 | 4.7 | 4.5 | 4.5 | A |
AG 94 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4.3 | 3.8 | 5 | 5 | 4.5 | 4 | 4.2 | 5 | 4.3 | 4 | 4.8 | 4.2 | 4.7 | 4.4 | A |
General weighted mean 4:53
Descriptive Equivalent Always
*Overall weighted means for the 4 courses is 4.5 which is "Always"
N/A
Graduate Number | Working ? | Location | In School? | Location |
1 | No | Yes | FSMFMI | |
2 | No | Yes | FSMFMI | |
3 | Yes | Island Farm-Applied at Yap Agri.Office | no | |
4 | Yes | Taxi Driver-Applied at Yap Agri. office | ||
5 | Yes | Yap Agri. office | No | |
6 | No | Yes | COMFSM National |
None is provided by IRPO. Data is collected through surveys completed by AFT graduates. Overall, data is insufficient as result of students didn’t show up or failed to complete or submit surveys. The survey is a form of questionnaires asking students their current situations and their plans of furthering their education.
N/A
N/A
Finding
This section provides discussion of information discovered as a result of the evaluation such as problems or concerns with the program and what part of the program is working well and meeting expectation.
Recommendation:
This section provides recommendations from the program on what to do to improve or enhance the quality of program and course learning outcomes as well as program goals and objectives. This section should also include suggestions that describe how the program might be able to create opportunities for a better program in the future. Some examples are exploring alternate delivery mechanisms, forming external partnerships, or realigning with other programs.
Recommendations for requested courses
AG 084- I believe that students who are actually in the program have higher interest in agriculture and motivation to do better in the course and achieve their slo's. Need more relevant textbook based on tropical horticulture, local crops and environment.
AG 94- The course title is very misleading and I believe it should be called "Introduction to farm management and marketing" instead. Prescribe a textbook that give the structure and management of smallholder farms especially the Pacific islands. Students need to be first enrolled in some basic Math course before enrolling in this course.
AG 96- Course No. and title is very misleading, Internship is often a second year course whereas this course is the opposite.
AG 92- A need to review another textbook for the course. It does not specifically discuss about swine and poultry production. Some information are not relevant to Micronesia.
This website and all COM-FSM Internet based services are best viewed with Firefox 3.0 or better.
© Copyright 2020 College of Micronesia-FSM | Site Disclaimer
P. O. Box 159, Kolonia, Pohnpei, 96941 - (691) 320-2480
College of Micronesia-FSM is accredited by the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges,
Western Association of Schools and Colleges, 428 J Street., Suite 400 Sacramento, CA 95814, (415) 506-0234,
an institutional accrediting body recognized by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation and the U.S. Department of Education.
Additional information about accreditation, including the filing of complaints against member institutions, can be found at: www.accjc.org