Program Review-Agriculture & Food Technology-YC

AP Full Official:Certificate of Achievement in Agriculture and Food Technology

Campus: Yap Campus

Completed by: Joy Guarin

AP Review Submission Date:March 31 2014

AR Review Cycle: 2012- 2013

  1. Program Goals

    Program Learning outcomes
    (Upon successful completion of this certificate, students will be able to)

    1. Demonstrate an overall knowledge of the crop production process,
    2. Practice good agricultural management and marketing skills,
    3. Identify and demonstrate the fundamentals of food processing, preparation techniques, the relationship between the scientific principle and cooking procedures
    4. Identify and demonstrate the basic skills and principles of swine and poultry production techniques, including breed selection, feed, housing, management techniques and animal health,
    5. Apply the basic skills and knowledge of nursery micro-propagation practices, transplanting, harvesting, and maintenance,
    6. Identify the proper use of land for agriculture purposes, local ornamental, and turf management.
  2. Program History

    In year 3000, Certificate of achievement program in agriculture and food technology was added . Fall 3008 upon opening the program again it started out with 10 students with the assistance of the US Department of Agriculture. At Yap campus it started during Summer of 2010 with 2 students.

  3. Program Descriptions

    Agriculture and Food Technology Certificate of Achievement offers courses that should be and are aligned with the degree program offered at COM-FSM National Campus. The program focuses on training of students to continue on for the degree program it also prepares student for the work force. Students will be able to take on jobs such as technicians or farming depending on their choices for the future.

  4. Program Admission Requirements

    Admission to Agriculture and Food Technology certificate is determined by the COMET results. High school graduates/equivalent: COMET results in respective programs.
    (High school graduate or GED certificate holder. Applicants must take the COM-FSM Entrance Test (COMET) and be accepted by the Admissions Board. Acceptance by the Admissions Board is based on the applicant’s score on the COMET and other criteria as defined by the Admissions Board.)

  5. Program Certificate/Degree Requirements

    The following are the major requirements:
    Program Requirements
            General Education Requirements....................13 credits

                     CA 100 Basic Computer Applications (3)
                     ESL 050 Technical English 050 (3)
                     MS 104 Technical Math I (4)
                     SC 098 Survey of Science (3))

    Technical Requirements..........................21 or 22 credits
             AG 084 Basic Crop Production (4)
             AG 096 Field Internship (5)

    Plus a minimum of 12 credits from the following:

                     AG 086 Micro-Propagation (4)
                     AG 088 Landscaping (3)
                     AG 090 Principles of Food Processing (3)
                     AG 092 Swine and Poultry Production (3)
                     AG 094 Farm Management and Marketing (3)

    TTotal Requirements.........................34 -35Credits

  6. Program Courses and Enrollment

    Program Enrollment
    Spring 2011 Fall 2011 Spring 2012 Summer 2012 Fall 2012 Spring 2013 Summer 2013 Fall 2013 Total
    7 17 9 3 21 23 16 26 122
    Spring 2012 Summer 2012 Fall 2012 Spring 2013 Summer 2013 Fall 2013 Total
    9 3 21 23 16 26 98

    * Number of students enrolled for Spring and Summer of 2012 are below 10. The summer enrollment for Summer 2012 is for Field internship.

    Courses Number Number of Section Course Enrollment Semester
    AG 88 1 12 Spring 2012
    AG 90 1 11 Spring 2012
    AG 92 1 5 Spring 2012
    AG 94 1 11 Spring 2012
    AG 84 1 18 Fall 2012
    AG 88 1 11 Fall 2012
    AG 92 1 17 Fall 2012
    AG 96 1 3 Fall 2012
    AG 86 1 19 Spring 2013
    AG 90 1 19 Spring 2013
    AG 94 1 18 Spring 2013
    AG 96 1 2 Spring 2013
    AG 84 1 16 Fall 2013
    AG 82 1 14 Fall 2013
    AG 96 1 5 Fall 2013

    *11 out of 15 courses offered for the 4 semesters have number of students above 10 except AG 96 and AG 92. Take note that AG 96 is an internship course.

  7. Program Faculty

    Name of Faculty Full time/Part time Degrees Held Rank
    Joy Guarin Part time DVM.,MS, PhD Professor
           
    Murukesan Krishnapillai Part Time BS,MS, PhD.  
           
    Steven Young Uhk Part Time BA, MA units Instructor
           
    Francis Ruegorong Part Time BA, MA Assistant Professor
           
    Peter Tairuwepiy Part Time BA Instructor
    Faculty student ratio for the program For 2012-2013
    Name of Faculty Number of Students Faculty Student Ratio
    5 98 1:20
  8. Program Indicators

    1. Assessment of course student learning outcomes of program courses

    Table 1. Fall 2012
    Course Instructor Name No.of Students Enrolled No.of Students with "W" No.of Students successful of SLO 1 No.of Students successful of SLO 2 No.of Students successful of SLO 3 No.of Students successful of SLO 4 No.of Students successful of SLO 5 No.of Students successful of SLO 6
    AG 84 Steven Young Uhk 18 2 12 14 15      
    AG0 88 Peter Tairuwepiv 11 2 9 9 9 9 9 9
    AG 92 Joy Guarin 17 2 15 14 14 15 14  
    AG 96 Francis Ruegorong 3 0 3 3 3      
    Table 3. Spring 2013
    Course Instructor Name No.of Students Enrolled No.of Students with "W" No.of Students successful of SLO 1 No.of Students successful of SLO 2 No.of Students successful of SLO 3 No.of Students successful of SLO 4 No.of Students successful of SLO 5 No.of Students successful of SLO 6
    AG 86 Steven Young Uhk 19 0 18 18 18 18    
    AG 90 Joy Guarin 19 1 18 18 10      
    AG 94 Francis Ruegonrong 18 1 13 13 13      
    AG 96 Murukesan K. 2 0 2 2 2      
    Table 4. Fall 2013
    Course Instructor Name No.of Students Enrolled No.of Students with "W" No.of Students successful of SLO 1 No.of Students successful of SLO 2 No.of Students successful of SLO 3 No.of Students successful of SLO 4 No.of Students successful of SLO 5 No.of Students successful of SLO 6
    AG 84 Steven Young Uhk 19\6 0 12 11 16      
    AG 92 Joy Guarin 14 0 14 14 14 14 14 14
    AG 96 Francis Ruegonrong 5 0 5 5 5      
    \

    2.Assessment of program student learning outcomes

    PSLO Assessment Report Summary (Yap Campus).

    What we looked at:
    The Agriculture and Food Technology certificate, assessment focused on PSLOs 1,2, 3, 4, and 6 using Pre-Post Test scores. Listed below are the results for each of the PSLOs. Note that no differential statistics was used to determine if there is a significant difference between Pre and Post test scores.

    What we found:

    PSLO 1. 16 students got an average Pre Test score of 35 and Post test score of 64 with a difference of 29 during Fall 2012 under the related course Basic Crop production.

    PSLO 2. 19 students got an average Pre Test score of 36 and Post test score of 58 with a difference of 22 during Spring 2013 under the related course Farm Management and Marketing.

    PSLO 3. 18 students got an average Pre-Test score of 64 and Post test score of 73 with a difference of 9 during Spring 2013 under the related course Principles of Food Processing.

    PSLO 4. 14 students got an average Pre-test score of 62 and Post Test score of 78 with a difference of 16 during Fall 2012 under the related course Swine and Poultry Production.

    PSLO 5. 19 students got an average of Pre-Test score of 25 and Post test score of 60 with a difference of 35 during Spring 2013 under the related course Micropropagation.

    PSLO 6. 11 students got an average of Pre-test score of 71 and Post test score of 80 with a difference of 9 during Fall 2012 under the related course Landscaping.

    What we are planning to work on:

    To continue improve on the post test scores by an item analysis of all the questions given in the pre-test by the instructor with the purpose of identifying what topics the students need to know more. These topics should be given emphasis during the lecture. Item analysis workshop can be scheduled before the start of the semester.

    Recommendations for students:

    Attend class regularly and be responsible for their own learning.
    Communicate course concerns with their instructors.

    3.Program enrollment (historical enrollment patterns, student credits by major)

    Table 1. Enrollment patterns)
    Term Bo. of Enrolled Students(YAP) Overall number of students enrolled (Kosrae,Pohnpei and Yap) Percentage
    Spring 2012 9 109 12%
    Fall 2012 21 145 15%
    Spring 2013 23 131 15%
    Fall 2013 26 170 15%
    Table 2. Credit by Major
    Term Bo. of Enrolled Students(YAP) Overall number of students enrolled (Kosrae,Pohnpei and Yap) Percentage
    Spring 2012 96 1202 8%
    Fall 2012 256 1621 16%
    Spring 2013 299 1404 21%
    Fall 2013 274 1711 16%
    Average 231    

    4.Average Class Size

    Course Completion & Withdrawals (Major)
    Term Section Enroll/Max Enrollment Enroll/Ratio(3?2) Average Ckass Size(3/1)
    Spring 2012 1        
    Fall 2012 4 80 45 56.25a% 11
    Spring 2013 4 110 60 54.5% 15
    Fall 2013 3 56 35 62.5% 12

    5.Course completion rate

    Table 1. Spring 2012 Completion Rate per Course <
    Course No. Instructor Name No. of Students Enrolled No. of Students with "W" No. of Students with a grade of F No. of Students completed the course Completion Rate(6/3)
    AG 88 Francis Ruegorong 12 0 3 9 75
    AG 90 Peter Tairuwepir 11 0 0 5 100
    AG 92 Joy Guarin 5 0 0 5 100
    AG 94 Peter Tairuwepiv 11 0 0 11 100
    Total Average Rate   39 0 3 36 94%


    Table 2. Fall 2012 Completion Rate per Course
    Course No. Instructor Name No. of Students Enrolled No. of Students with "W" No. of Students with a grade of F No. of Students completed the course Completion Rate(6/3)
    AG 84 Steven Young Uhk 18 2 1 15 83.33
    AG 88 Peter Tairuwepiy 11 2 0 9 82
    AG 92 Joy Guarin 17 2 1 14 82.4
    AG 96 Francis Ruegorong 3 0 0 3 100
    Total/Average Rate   49 6 2 38 87%


    Table 3. Spring 2013 Completion Rate per Course
    Course No. Instructor Name No. of Students Enrolled No. of Students with "W" No. of Students with a grade of F No. of Students completed the course Completion Rate(6/3)
    AG 86 Steven Young Uhk 19 0 1 18 95
    AG 90 Joy Guarin 19 1 0 18 95
    AG 94 Francis Ruegorong 18 1 5 12 67
    AG 96 Murukesan K. 2 0 0 2 100
    Total/Average Rate   58 2 6 50 89%


    Table 4. Summer 2013 Completion Rate per Course
    Course No. Instructor Name No. of Students Enrolled No. of Students with "W" No. of Students with a grade of F No. of Students completed the course Completion Rate(6/3)
    AG 96 Francis Ruegorong 2 0 1 1 50


    Table 5. Fall 2013 Completion Rate per Course
    Course No. Instructor Name No. of Students Enrolled No. of Students with "W" No. of Students with a grade of F No. of Students completed the course Completion Rate(6/3)
    AG 84 Steven Young Uhk 16 0 0 16 100
    AG 92 Joy Guarin 14 0 0 14 100
    AG 96 Francis Ruegorong 5 0 0 5 100
    Total Average Rate   35 0 0 35 100%
    *Rate of students with W- 4.9%; Rate of students with a grade of F- 7.4%; General completion rate- 84%. It was affected by the 50% completion rate during Summer 2013.

    6. Student persistence rate (semester to semester)

    Persistence rate is based on Fall new students (full time) cohorts who return the following spring semester.
    Number of New students , Full time for Fall 2012 Same students, Spring 2013 Persistence Rate(%)
    9 7 78%

    7. Student retention rate (Fall-to-Fall for two-year programs; Fall-to-Spring for one-year programs)

    Number of New students , Full time for Fall 2012 Same students, Spring 2013 Retention Rate(%)
    9 6 67%

    8. Success rates on licensing or certification exams (CTE, TP, Nursing, etc)

    N/A

    9. Graduation rate based on yearly number

    Term Number of Graduates
    Spring 2012 0
    Fall 2012 4
    Spring 2013 1
    Summer 2013 1
    Fall 2013 0
    Total 6

    10.Students seat cost

    At the present tuition rate of $105 per credit the total seat cost per student completing this program is $3990. The table below shows detailed information.

    Classes Credits CPC CPS
    CA 100 3 $105 $315
    ESL 050 3 $105 $315
    MS 104 4 $105 $420
    SC 098 3 $105 $315
    AG 084 4 $105 $420
    AG 096 5 $105 $525/td>
    AG 086 4 $105 $420
    AG 88 3 $105 $315
    AG 90 3 $105 $315
    AG 92 3 $105 $315
    AG 94 3 $105 $315
    TOTAL 38   $3990

    Total Requirements...............................34-35 Credits

    11. Cost of duplicate or redundant courses, programs or services

    N/A

    12. Students' satisfaction rate

    Students were given a satisfaction survey for each class at the end of every semester. There were 15 items in the survey and students were asked to rate each class according to these items on a scale of 1 to 5; 1 being never , 2 is rarely, 3 as sometimes, 4 is usually and 5 being always. The table below shows detailed information on the students’ satisfaction survey from Spring 2013 to Fall 2013.

    Students’ Satisfaction Survey Results(Weighted Means) Legend:
    The following are the items used in the survey

    1-Keeps regular schedule every class day. 2-Shows interest in the subject. 3-Gives individual help as needed 4-Avails self for student conference.5- Welcomes questions, suggestions, and discussions from students 6- Shows interest and respect for students.7-Shows interest and respect for students.8- Helps the students in meeting individual learning needs.9- Uses classroom/lab time fully 10-Provides clear directions for assignments and instruction. 11-Grades fairly.12- Makes the purpose of the course clear. 13-Talks clearly and at an easy-to-follow speed.14- Paces the lessons well with activity as well as lecture. 15 Makes the course interesting.16- Textbook was appropriate and helpful. N-Number of students; AWM Average Weighted Mean; D – Descriptive Equivalent; U- Usually; A- Always


    Fall 2012
    Courses N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 AWM D
    AG 92 9 4.9 4.3 4.1 3.9 4.6 4.3 4 5 4.7 4.9 4.7 3.8 4.7 4.1   4.4 A
    Spring 2013
    Courses N 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 AWM D
    AG 86 13 4.2 4.7 4.7 4.4 4.7 4.9 4.6 4.5 4.8 4.9 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.8 4.7 A
    AG 90 12 4.9 4.3 4.3 4.2 4.8 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.4 4.2 4.6 4.6 4.8 4.7 4.5 4.5 A
    AG 94 6 4 4 4.3 3.8 5 5 4.5 4 4.2 5 4.3 4 4.8 4.2 4.7 4.4 A

    General weighted mean 4:53
    Descriptive Equivalent Always

    *Overall weighted means for the 4 courses is 4.5 which is "Always"

    13. Alumni data

    N/A

    14. Employment data and employer feedback (employer survey)

    Graduates during FY 2012 and 2013
    Graduate Number Working ? Location In School? Location
    1 No   Yes FSMFMI
    2 No   Yes FSMFMI
    3 Yes Island Farm-Applied at Yap Agri.Office no  
    4 Yes Taxi Driver-Applied at Yap Agri. office    
    5 Yes Yap Agri. office No  
    6 No   Yes COMFSM National

    None is provided by IRPO. Data is collected through surveys completed by AFT graduates. Overall, data is insufficient as result of students didn’t show up or failed to complete or submit surveys. The survey is a form of questionnaires asking students their current situations and their plans of furthering their education.

    14.Program added or cancelled at nearby regional institutions (PCC, GCC, Hawaii schools, UOG, CMI, NMC)

    N/A

    15. Transfer Rate

    N/A

  9. Analysis and Recommendation

    Finding
    This section provides discussion of information discovered as a result of the evaluation such as problems or concerns with the program and what part of the program is working well and meeting expectation.

    1. Number of students enrolled for Spring and Summer of 2012 are below 10. The summer enrollment for Summer 2012 is for Field internship.
    2. 11 out of 15 courses offered for the 4 semesters have number of students above 10 except AG 96 and AG 92. Take note that AG 96 is an internship course.
    3. Faculty Student Ratio is 1:20.
    4. Course Level Assessments were done in Fall 2012 , Spring 2013, and Fall 2013.
    5. Program Learning Outcomes Assessments was conducted in 6 PLOs of the program using Pre-Post Tests.
    6. Average credits enrolled by the students per semester is 231 .
    7. Rate of students with W- 4.9%; Rate of students with a grade of F- 7.4%; General completion rate- 84%. It was affected by the 50% completion rate during Summer 2013.
    8. Persistence rate of 78%.
    9. Retention rate of 67%.
    10. Graduates for 2012-2013 is 6.
    11. Overall weighted means for the 4 courses is 4.5 which is "Always" from the

    Recommendation:

    This section provides recommendations from the program on what to do to improve or enhance the quality of program and course learning outcomes as well as program goals and objectives. This section should also include suggestions that describe how the program might be able to create opportunities for a better program in the future. Some examples are exploring alternate delivery mechanisms, forming external partnerships, or realigning with other programs.

    Recommendations for requested courses

    1. All faculty should complete course level assessment every semester.
    2. Improve data collection and management in Course Level Assessment. The following are the recommendations based on the course level assessments:

      AG 084- I believe that students who are actually in the program have higher interest in agriculture and motivation to do better in the course and achieve their slo's. Need more relevant textbook based on tropical horticulture, local crops and environment.

      AG 94- The course title is very misleading and I believe it should be called "Introduction to farm management and marketing" instead. Prescribe a textbook that give the structure and management of smallholder farms especially the Pacific islands. Students need to be first enrolled in some basic Math course before enrolling in this course.

      AG 96- Course No. and title is very misleading, Internship is often a second year course whereas this course is the opposite.

      AG 92- A need to review another textbook for the course. It does not specifically discuss about swine and poultry production. Some information are not relevant to Micronesia.

This website and all COM-FSM Internet based services are best viewed with Firefox 3.0 or better.
© Copyright 2020 College of Micronesia-FSM | Site Disclaimer
P. O. Box 159, Kolonia, Pohnpei, 96941 - (691) 320-2480
College of Micronesia-FSM is accredited by the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges,
Western Association of Schools and Colleges, 428 J Street., Suite 400 Sacramento, CA 95814, (415) 506-0234,
an institutional accrediting body recognized by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation and the U.S. Department of Education.
Additional information about accreditation, including the filing of complaints against member institutions, can be found at: www.accjc.org