- Our College
- Academics
- Student Services
- Public Reports
- Forum
- Library
- Quick Access
Program Review
Computer Information Systems
National Campus
Year 2011
Campus Location:
National Campus
Program Name :
Computer Information Systems
Division Affiliation:
Business Division
List all degrees awarded:
A.S. in Computer Information Systems
Program Review Committee: |
|
Joseph Felix Jr. |
- Chair – Business Division |
Edper Castro |
- Instructor - CIS |
Marlene Mangonon |
- Instructor – CIS/Marketing |
Institutional Mission: Historically diverse, uniquely Micronesian, and globally connected, the College of
I.PROGRAM ESSENTIALS
a.HISTORY: In today’s world, information is a very vital resource in an organization. In order to efficiently utilize information of any form in an organization however, this has to be processed within the organization. This is where information technology with its varied tools becomes very indispensable.
In the Federated States of Micronesia, however humble its beginning might be, it is imperative that this information technology, coupled with communications has to be taught and learned in the lone college so that the people can be educated and organizations can adapt to, and gradually become at pace with the world trend. With this necessity, the semester Fall 1998 saw the emergence of a new academic program offering at
b.DESCRIPTION: The Associate of Science in Computer Information Systems program concentrates on organizational applications of information and communications technology and the development of systems and their management. Students receive a fundamental understanding of programming, web engineering, database designing and networking, which prepare them for
c.MISSION: Associate of Science in Computer Information Systems provides students with a solid foundation in theory and practice of the computer information systems and prepares them to meet the immediate job market needs, adapt themselves to the rapidly evolving computer industry and further their education in a higher degree program. This contributes to the college’s mission of assisting in the development of the Federated States of Micronesia, and to be globally connected.
d.GOALS:
1.To provide the students an
2.To provide literacy training on basic software productivity tools such as word processing, spreadsheets, electronic presentations, desktop publishing, internet and other office applications.
3.To help the students understand and apply various computer information systems tools such as database design and management, webpage engineering, programming and networking.
4.To ingrain to the students the necessity of continuous upgrading to keep at pace with the
5.To prepare graduates of this program to advance to a higher information and communications technology program.
e.LEARNING OUTCOMES :
Outcome 1: Demonstrate an
Outcome 2: Demonstrate theoretical knowledge and practical skills in the management and strategic use of information systems and technology.
Outcome 3 Demonstrate proficiency in the use of different software applications significant to manipulating and analyzing information as well as generating and presenting reports in the various functional areas of business.
Outcome 4: Demonstrate a solid foundation skills in database design and management, web engineering, programming, and networking;
Outcome 5: Demonstrate the ability to adapt to latest technologies using their foundation knowledge and skills from CIS.
f.ADMISSION REQUIREMENTS :
Applicants must meet the following admission requirements to be matriculated into this degree program:
1. Have graduated or will graduate from high school at the end of the current school year, or have a GED certificate;
2. Have a minimum high school grade point average of 2.0 as measured on a 4.0 scale, or a minimal score of 35 on each section and an average of 45 for all five sections of the GED test, and;
3. Be accepted by the
g. DEGREE REQUIREMENTS – In Summary
i. |
Satisfactory completion of the applicable General Education Core - 29 credits |
|
ii. |
Satisfactory completion of the prescribed CIS major courses - |
40 credits |
|
__________________ |
|
|
TOTAL |
69 credits |
iii.Cumulative Grade Point Average (GPA) of at least 2.0 h. DEGREE REQUIREMENTS – Detail
i.Preparatory Courses – By Placement
ii.General Education Core courses
English (9 credits)
EN 110 Advanced Reading (3) EN 120a Expository Writing I (3)
EN 120b Expository Writing II (3)
Mathematics (3 credits)
Any 100 level or above mathematics course (3)
Natural Sciences (7 credits)
A science course with Laboratory or AG 110 or AG 140 (4) A
Social Sciences (3 credits)
SS 150 History of Micronesia (3)
Computer Applications (3 credits)
CA 100 Computer Literacy (3)
Exercise Sports Science (1 credit)
Exercise Sports Science course (1)
Humanities (3 credits)
Any course in art, music, history, literature, philosophy, or language (3)
iii.CIS Major Courses
Information Systems (19 credits)
IS 201 Computer Information Systems (3) IS 220 Computer Programming (3)
IS 230 Database Design (3) IS 240 Webpage Design (3)
IS 260 Business Information Systems (3)
IS 280 Introduction to
Business (6 credits)
AC 131 Accounting I (3)
BU 101 Introduction to Business (3)
Communications (3 credits)
EN/BU 121 Business Communication (3)
Mathematics (6 credits)
MS 101 Algebra and Trigonometry (3) MS 150 Statistics (3)
Electives: Any two of the following courses (6 credits)
CA 105 Data Analysis Using Spreadsheets (3) MM 225 Multimedia Design (3)
IS/MM 245 Desktop Publishing (3)
MM 240 Computer Animation (3)
IS 270 Geographic Information Systems (3)
i. PROGRAM COURSES AND DESCRIPTION
IS 201 Computer Information Systems (3)
Prerequisite: CA 100
Provides fundamental understanding of computers and information systems. Exposes students to tools and technologies used in the
IS 220 Computer Programming (3)
Prerequisite: IS 201
Provides an introduction to computer science programming using Microsoft Visual Basic. NET. Course aims at presenting programming concepts, and then a series of
IS 230 Database Design (3)
Prerequisite: IS 201
Covers the fundamentals of database and the process of database design, including data modeling, the entity relationship, and relational models. Involves
IS 240 Webpage Design (3)
Prerequisite: CA100
An introduction to the "language" of web pages (Hypertext Markup Language) and to a more advanced scripting language, JavaScript. Students learn the HTML tags necessary to develop a
IS 260 Business Information Systems (3)
Prerequisite: BU101, IS 220, or concurrently with permission of the instructor.
Introduces students to the management of
IS 270 Geographic Information Systems (3)
Prerequisite: IS 201
Provides an introduction to Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and its application in several disciplines such as physical planning, mapping, land and utilities management, using available GIS Software.
IS 280 Introduction to
Prerequisite: IS 201
Introduces students to the principles, terminology, and concepts of computer networking from a variety of perspectives. Covering a variety of topics, students acquire a strong foundation of computer networking principles and practices. Regular lectures are supplemented by a one credit laboratory for demonstration by the instructor and
IS/MM 245 Desktop Publishing (3)
Desktop Publishing is designed to improve the student's visual communication skills, increase spatial and aesthetic perception and discrimination, expand computer skills and technical vocabulary, and develop effective visual communication strategies. The course will focus on projects such as newsletters, annual reports, brochures, and promotional materials as well as on getting the student to utilize other software capabilities. This is a studio arts course; at least half of the contact hours will be in the studio lab.
AC 131 Accounting I (3)
Prerequisite: ESL 089, MS 098
Establishes a foundation for the understanding of the accounting environment, basic accounting concepts, and the accounting model. Each step of the accounting cycle is covered in detail. Also covered are the sales, purchases, cash receipts and cash payments journals and their accompanying accounts receivable and accounts payable subsidiary ledgers; cash; and preparation of financial statements.
BU 101 Introduction to Business (3)
Prerequisite: ESL 089
Establishes a foundation for the understanding of contemporary business and its environment. The course covers the various functional areas of business: management and organization, human resources, marketing, financing, accounting, and information systems. Business ethics and social responsibility, the global business environment and basic FSM business laws/regulations are also covered.
EN/BU 121 Business Communication (3)
Prerequisites: BU 101, CA 100
This course focuses on intercultural writing and speaking skills appropriate for business. Business writing and oral skills are emphasized.
MS 101 Algebra and Trigonometry (3)
Prerequisite: C or better in MS 100
Introduces the students to quadratric, log, exponential, and trigonometric functions.
MS 150 Statistics (3)
Prerequisite: MS 100
Introduces the basic ideas of data presentation, descriptive statistics, basic probability, and inferential statistics. Incorporates the use of a computer spreadsheet package, MS Excel, for both data analysis and presentation.
Studies basic concepts using applications from business, social science, health science, and the natural sciences.
CA 105 Data Analysis Using Spreadsheets (3)
Prerequisite: CA 100
Hinges on the use of a spreadsheet application to create and manipulate data in worksheets and workbooks in order to derive solutions to typical business scenarios. Students use various MS Excel tools and functions (including statistical functions, data validation, protection, pivot tables, filtering, scenarios, etc.) at an
MM 225 Multimedia Design (3)
Prerequisites: CA 100 or permission of instructor
This course presents essential multimedia design principles, professional vocabulary and current technology. Students will learn to design an interactive multimedia educational presentation. Students will also acquire the foundation of knowledge and skills necessary to continue study toward becoming a professional multimedia designer.
MM 240 Computer Animation (3)
Prerequisites: Any Art class and CA 100 or permission of instructor Computer animation is designed to improve students' visual communication skills, increase temporal, spatial and esthetic perception and discrimination, expand computer skills and technical vocabulary, and employ effective visual communication strategies for use across academic disciplines. This is a studio arts course; at least half of the contact hours will be in the studio lab.
II.PROGRAM FACULTY
a.
1.JOSEPH FELIX, JR, Associate Professor
Bachelor of Science in Computer Science
(Park College, Missouri)
Master of Science in Information Systems
(National University, California)
2.MARLENE MANGONON, Instructor
Bachelor in Computer Data Processing Management
(Polytechnic University of the Philippines, Philippines)
Master in Business Administration
(Virgen Milagrosa University, Philippines)
3.EDPER CASTRO, Instructor
Bachelor of Science in Information and Computer Science
(Cebu Institute of Technology, Philippines)
Diploma in Computer Science
(Open University, University of the Philippines, Philippines)
Masters in Information Systems
(Open University, University of the Philippines, Philippines)
4.RAFAEL PULMANO, Assistant Professor
Certified Public Accountant
(Philippine Board of Accountancy, since 1982)
Bachelor of Science in Commerce, Major in Accounting (Saint Michael's College of Laguna, Philippines)
Master in Business Administration
(National College of Business and Arts, Philippines)
5.MARIAN MEDALLA, Instructor
Certified Public Accountant
(Philippine Board of Accountancy, since 2001)
Bachelor of Science in Accountancy
(Mindanao State University, Philippines)
Master in Business Administration
(Notre Dame of Dadiangas College, Philippines)
6.RUCI YAUVOLI, Instructor
Bachelor of Arts in Business
(University of the South Pacific)
Diploma in Credit Analysis
(New York University)
Master in Business Administration
(University of the South Pacific)
b.
1.GEORGE MANGONON, Instructor
Bachelor of Science in Mathematics
(University of the Philippines, Philippines)
Master in Business Administration
(Virgen Milagrosa University, Philippines)
III.ASSESSMENT PLAN
COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS(CIS) DEGREE PROGRAM
(AY2007- AY2012)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOMES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
|
ACADEMIC |
|
|
PL01 |
|
|
PL02 |
|
|
|
|
|
PL03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PL04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PL05 |
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
YEAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S E M E S T E R S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
fall |
|
|
spring summer |
|
fall spring |
|
summer |
|
fall |
|
spring |
|
summer |
|
|
fall |
spring |
|
summer |
|
|
fall |
|
|
spring |
|
summer |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IS280 |
|
|
|
IS280 |
|
BU101 |
|
|
|
IS280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
S280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BU101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IS280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IS260 |
|
|
|
|
|
IS260 |
|
|
|
IS240 |
|
IS260 |
|
CA105 |
|
IS240 |
|
|
IS260 |
CA105 |
|
IS240 |
|
|
IS260 |
|
|
CA105 |
|
IS240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IS201 |
|
|
AC131 |
|
|
IS201 |
|
|
|
|
|
IS201 |
|
AC131 |
|
|
|
|
IS201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IS201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IS260 |
|
IS260 |
IS260 |
|
IS260 |
|
IS260 |
IS280 |
IS280 |
IS280 |
IS280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IS280 |
IS280 |
IS280 |
IS280 |
IS280 |
IS280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOMES |
|
|
|
|
|
||||
ACADEMIC |
|
|
PL01 |
|
|
PL02 |
|
|
PL03 |
|
PL04 |
|
PL05 |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YEAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S E M E S T E R S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
fall spring summer |
|
fall spring |
summer fall |
spring summer |
fall |
spring summer |
fall |
spring summer |
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BU101 |
|
|
|
BU101 |
|
|
|
IS230 |
IS230 |
|
IS230 |
IS230 |
|
IS230 |
IS230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IS220 |
IS230 |
|
IS220 |
IS230 |
|
IS220 |
IS230 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IS240 |
|
CA105 |
IS240 |
|
CA105 |
IS240 |
|
CA105 |
IS240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AC131 |
IS260 |
IS260 |
AC131 |
IS260 |
IS260 |
IS260 |
IS280 |
IS280 |
|
IS280 |
IS280 |
IS280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROGRAM LEARNING OUTCOMES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
ACADEMIC |
|
|
PL01 |
|
|
PL02 |
|
|
PL03 |
|
|
|
PL04 |
|
|
PL05 |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YEAR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S E M E S T E R S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
fall |
spring |
summer |
|
fall |
spring |
summer |
|
fall |
spring |
summer |
|
fall |
|
spring |
summer |
|
fall |
|
spring |
summer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IS260 |
|
|
|
IS260 |
|
|
|
IS260 |
IS240 |
|
|
IS260 |
|
IS240 |
|
|
IS260 |
|
IS240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MM225 |
MM240 |
|
|
MM225 |
|
MM240 |
|
|
MM225 |
|
MM240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IS245 |
IS240 |
|
|
IS245 |
|
IS240 |
|
|
IS245 |
|
IS240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MS101 |
MS150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BU121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BU121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Academic Programs |
|
|
Assessment Plan |
COMPUTER INFORMATION |
|
AY 2007 FALL- AY2012 SPRING |
SYSTEMS (CIS) |
|
|
Academic Program |
|
Assessment Period Covered |
( X ) Formative Assessment |
|
August 8, 2008 |
( ) Summative Assessment |
|
Date Submitted |
Institutional Mission/Strategic Goals
Mission: Historically diverse, uniquely Micronesian and globally connected, the College of
Strategic Goals
1.Promote learning and teaching for knowledge, skills creativity, intellect and the abilities to seek and analyze information and to communicate effectively;
2.Foster effective communications;
3.Build partnering and services network for community, workforce and economic development.
4.Provide for continuous improvement of programs, services and college environment
Business Division Mission and Goals
Mission: The Business Division of the College of
Goals:
1.To develop students with appropriate skills and values in the areas of accounting, business, and computer information systems that will be useful in their future employment or entrepreneurial pursuits.
2.To prepare the students who intend to further their studies and pursue higher degree(s) in other learning institutions.
3.To spearhead the move towards establishing linkages with other academic institutions, the community, government, and private business sector.
4.To develop and offer
CIS Program Mission and Goals
Mission: CIS provides students with a solid foundation in theory and practice of the computer information systems and prepare them to meet the immediate job market needs, adapt themselves to the rapidly evolving computer industry and further their education in a higher degree program. This contributes to the college’s mission of assisting in the development of the Federated States of Micronesia, and to be globally connected.
Goals:
1.To provide the students an
2.To provide literacy training on basic software productivity tools such as word processing, spreadsheets, electronic presentations, desktop publishing, internet and other office applications.
3.To help the students understand and apply various computer information systems tools such as database design and management, webpage engineering, programming and networking.
4.To ingrain to the students the necessity of continuous upgrading to keep at pace with the
5.To prepare graduates of this program to advance to a higher information and communications technology program.
CIS Program Learning Outcomes:
PL 1: Demonstrate an
PL 2: Demonstrate theoretical knowledge and practical skills in the management and strategic use of information systems and technology.
PL 3 Demonstrate proficiency in the use of different software applications significant to manipulating and analyzing information as well as generating and presenting reports in the various functional areas of business.
PL 4: Demonstrate a solid foundation skills in database design and management, web engineering, programming, and networking
PL 5: Demonstrate the ability to adapt to latest technologies using their foundation knowledge and skills from CIS.
Evaluation questions |
Data |
Sampling |
Analysis |
|
|
sources |
|
|
|
1. Can the students recognize, define |
|
|
Percentag |
|
Test |
|
e, Mean, |
||
and explain technical concepts and |
|
|||
Questions |
IS201 class |
and |
||
ethical issues pertaining to information |
||||
and Results |
|
Standard |
||
systems? |
|
|||
|
|
Deviation |
||
|
|
|
||
2. Can the students recognize, define |
Test |
BU101, |
Percentag |
|
and explain theoretical knowledge and |
e, Mean, |
|||
Questions |
AC131, |
|||
demonstrate practical skills in the |
and |
|||
and Results |
BU121, |
|||
management and strategic use of |
Standard |
|||
and Projects |
IS260 class |
|||
information and technology? |
Deviation |
|||
|
|
|||
|
CA100, |
Percentag |
||
3. Can the students demonstrate |
e, Mean, |
|||
Exercises and |
CA105, |
|||
practical skills in the use of basic |
and |
|||
Exams, |
ELECTIVE |
|||
software applications? |
Standard |
|||
projects |
class |
|||
|
Deviation |
|||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Percentag |
||
4. Can the students demonstrate skills |
Exercises and |
|
||
IS220, |
e, Mean, |
|||
in database design and management, |
Exams, and |
|||
IS230, |
and |
|||
web engineering, programming and |
Software |
|||
IS240, IS280 |
Standard |
|||
networking? |
development |
|||
|
Deviation |
|||
|
projects |
|
||
|
|
|
||
5. How many students were able to pass |
|
All CIS |
Percentag |
|
OAR/IRPO |
Courses |
|||
the next higher level CIS courses? |
e |
|||
|
Classes |
|||
|
|
|
||
6. How many students were able to |
|
Yearly |
Percentag |
|
OAR/IRPO |
graduates of |
|||
graduate in the CIS program? |
e |
|||
|
the program |
|||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
Evaluation questions |
Data |
Sampling |
Analysis |
|
|
sources |
|
|
|
7. What job placements did the CIS |
Employers, |
Survey/Inter |
Frequency |
|
graduates land to? |
Alumni |
view |
||
|
||||
8. What workplace application skills were |
|
Survey/Inter |
|
|
able to be satisfied by the graduates of |
Employers |
Frequency |
||
view |
||||
the CIS program? |
|
|
||
|
|
|
||
9. How many students were able to |
OAR |
|
|
|
Alumni |
Yearly |
|
||
pursue higher degree programs in this |
Percentag |
|||
|
graduates of |
|||
field in other educational institutions |
|
e |
||
Other Educ’l. |
the program |
|||
starting from the pioneer graduates? |
|
|||
Institutions |
|
|
||
|
|
|
Timeline
Activity |
Who is |
Date |
|
|
Responsible? |
|
|
ASSESS ON EVALUATION QUESTION 1 |
|
Will be given at |
|
|
CIS Instructor |
||
|
the end of each |
||
Students will be given an assignments, |
handling the course |
||
lesson discussion |
|||
chapter tests, class activities. |
|
||
|
|
||
ASSESS ON EVALUATION QUESTION 2 |
|
Will be given at |
|
|
CIS Instructor |
||
|
the end of each |
||
Students will be given an assignments, |
handling the course |
||
lesson discussion |
|||
chapter tests, |
|
||
|
|
||
ASSESS ON EVALUATION QUESTION 3 |
|
|
|
|
CIS Instructor |
Will be given at |
|
Students will be given an assignments, |
the end of each |
||
handling the course |
|||
chapter tests, |
lesson discussion |
||
|
|||
major project development. |
|
|
|
ASSESS ON EVALUATION QUESTION 4 |
CIS Instructor |
Will be given at |
|
|
the end of each |
||
|
handling the course |
||
Students will be given an assignments, |
lesson discussion |
||
|
chapter tests, |
|
|
|
major project development. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GATHER/COLLECT FOR QUESTION 5 |
CIS Program |
During Program |
|
|
|||
Obtain data from Office of the Admissions |
Coordinator/Division |
Assessment |
|
Chair/VPIA Office |
Period |
||
and Records(OAR)/IRPO |
|||
|
|
||
GATHER/COLLECT FOR QUESTION 6 |
CIS Program |
During Program |
|
|
|||
Obtain data from Office of the Admissions |
Coordinator/Division |
Assessment |
|
Chair/VPIA Office |
Period |
||
and Records(OAR)/IRPO |
|||
|
|
||
GATHER/COLLECT FOR QUESTION 7 |
CIS Program |
During Program |
|
|
|||
Conduct Survey Interview from Employers |
Coordinator/Division |
Assessment |
|
Chair/VPIA Office |
Period |
||
and Alumni |
|||
|
|
||
GATHER/COLLECT FOR QUESTION 8 |
CIS Program |
During Program |
|
|
Coordinator/Division |
Assessment |
|
Conduct Survey Interview from Companies |
Chair/VPIA Office |
Period |
|
|
|
|
|
GATHER/COLLECT FOR QUESTION 9 |
CIS Program |
During Program |
|
|
|||
Obtain data from Office of the Admissions |
Coordinator/Division |
Assessment |
|
Chair/VPIA Office |
Period |
||
and Records(OAR) and Alumni |
|||
|
|
|
IV. |
PROGRAM OUTCOME ANALYSIS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
a. Health Indicators |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
i. Program Enrollment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year |
|
|
Spring |
|
Summer |
|
Fall |
|
Total |
|||||
|
2008 |
|
|
No Data |
|
|
No Data |
|
|
164 |
|
|
164 (Incomplete) |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
No Data |
|
No Data |
183 |
|
|
183 (Incomplete) |
||||||
|
2010 |
|
|
169 |
|
|
165 |
|
|
191 |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
Previous Enrollment Data on the last Program Review |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
Year |
|
|
Spring |
|
Summer |
|
Fall |
|
Total |
|
||||
|
2005 |
|
|
142 |
|
|
74 |
|
|
165 |
|
|
381 |
|
|
2006 |
|
152 |
|
68 |
|
150 |
|
370 |
|
|
|||||
|
2007 |
|
|
125 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
136 |
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
|
ii. Program Graduate Count |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
Year |
|
|
Spring |
|
Summer |
|
Fall |
|
Total |
|||||
|
2008 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
2009 |
|
12 |
|
2 |
|
12 |
|
26 |
|
|
|||||
|
2010 |
|
|
16 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
32 |
|
|
iii. Completion Rate
Summer 2009
|
Course |
|
Number of |
|
Succeeded |
|
Succeeded |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Students |
|
Count or |
|
Percentage |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
students |
(%) |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
who got A,B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or C. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IS230 |
|
|
12 |
|
|
9 |
|
|
75% |
|
|
|
IS240 |
28 |
|
20 |
|
71.42% |
|
|
||||
|
Fall 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Course |
|
Number of |
|
Succeeded |
|
Succeeded |
|||||
|
|
|
|
Students |
|
Count or |
|
Percentage |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
students |
(%) |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
who got A,B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or C. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
IS230 |
|
|
25 |
|
|
19 |
|
|
76% |
|
|
|
IS240 |
25 |
|
14 |
|
56% |
|
|
||||
|
IS260 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
20 |
|
|
83.33% |
|
|
|
IS280 |
21 |
|
18 |
|
85.71% |
|
|
||||
|
Spring 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Course |
|
Number of |
|
Succeeded |
|
Succeeded |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
Students |
|
Count or |
|
Percentage |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
students |
(%) |
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
who got A,B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or C. |
|
|
|
|
|
IS230 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
39.1% |
|
|
IS240 |
|
20 |
|
12 |
|
60% |
|
||||
|
IS260 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
86.96% |
|
|
IS280 |
|
19 |
|
18 |
|
94.73% |
|
||||
|
Summer 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Course |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Succeeded |
|
|
Succeeded |
|
|
|
|
|
Students |
|
|
|
Count or |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
students |
|
(%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
who got A,B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or C. |
|
|
|
|
|
IS230 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
70.83% |
|
|
IS240 |
|
23 |
|
18 |
|
78.26% |
|
||||
|
Fall 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Course |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
Succeeded |
|
|
Succeeded |
|
|
|
|
|
Students |
|
|
|
Count or |
|
|
Percentage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
students |
|
(%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
who got A,B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or C. |
|
|
|
|
|
IS230 |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
59.1% |
|
|
IS240 |
|
19 |
|
6 |
|
31.58% |
|
||||
|
IS260 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
91.30% |
|
|
IS280 |
|
20 |
|
17 |
|
85% |
|
Spring 2011
|
Course |
|
Number of |
|
Succeeded |
|
Succeeded |
||||
|
|
|
|
Students |
|
Count or |
|
Percentage |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
students |
(%) |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
who got A,B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or C. |
|
|
|
|
|
IS230 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
87.5% |
|
|
IS240 |
21 |
|
15 |
|
71.43% |
|
||||
|
IS260 |
|
|
23 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
91.30% |
|
|
IS280 |
23 |
|
21 |
|
91.30% |
|
||||
|
Summer 2011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Course |
|
Number of |
|
Succeeded |
|
Succeeded |
||||
|
|
|
|
Students |
|
Count or |
|
Percentage |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
students |
(%) |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
who got A,B |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
or C. |
|
|
|
|
|
IS230 |
|
|
24 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
70.83% |
|
|
IS240 |
25 |
|
22 |
|
88% |
|
Succeeded Percentage Summary
Course |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Spring |
|
|
Summer |
|
|
|
Fall |
|
|
|
AVE(%) |
|
|
|
Spring |
|
|
|
Summer |
|
|
|
Fall |
|
|
AVE(%) |
|
|
Spring |
|
|
|
Summer |
|
|
AVE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(%) |
|
IS230 |
|
|
|
75% |
|
76% |
|
|
75.5% |
|
39.1% |
|
70.83% |
|
59.1% |
|
|
56.34% |
|
87.5% |
|
70.83% |
|
|
79.17% |
|
|||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IS240 |
|
|
|
|
71.42% |
|
|
|
56% |
|
|
|
63.71% |
|
|
|
60% |
|
|
|
78.26% |
|
|
|
56.61% |
|
|
64.96% |
|
|
71.43% |
|
|
|
88% |
|
|
79.72% |
|
IS260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
83.33% |
|
|
|
|
|
86.96% |
|
|
|
|
|
91.30% |
|
|
89.13% |
|
91.30% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IS280 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85.71% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94.73% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85% |
|
|
89.87% |
|
|
91.30% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b. Course Level Assessments
IS 230 – Database Design / Fall Semester 2010 / 24
SLO# |
Program |
I, D, M |
Reflection/Comment |
|
SLO# |
|
|
SLO#1 Describe the |
SLO #4 |
I, D |
Number of students successful on this SLO |
types of databases, |
Demonstrate |
|
|
common database |
a solid |
|
Assessment Type : Quiz |
models, and a brief |
foundation |
|
|
history of relational |
skills in |
|
|
database. |
database |
|
|
|
design and |
|
9 of 24 students, or 37.5%, obtained a grade of C or higher. |
|
management, |
|
|
|
web |
|
A =1, B = 2, C = 6, D = 5, F = 10(3) |
|
engineering, |
|
|
SLO#4 Discuss |
|
|
|
database related |
programming, |
|
|
terminology in |
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
relational database |
networking; |
Note : The ‘F’ grade 10(3) means out of 10 students who got ‘F’, 3 did not |
design. |
|
take the Quiz. |
SLO#5 Identify the |
Assessment Type : |
components of data |
|
structures in database |
19 of 24 students, or 79.16%, obtained a grade of C or higher. |
design |
|
|
A = 2, B = 9, C = 8, D = 1, F = 4 |
Note : 2 out of 4 students with an ‘F’ grade did not perform at least 1 of the 2 exercises.
Level at which students were successful
Introduction (I), Demonstrate(D)
How SLO was assessed.
Formative: Class Participation,
Summative:
Comments on Student Learning :
|
|
|
- Two types of assessments were used, namely, a Quiz and |
|
|
|
Exercises simply because in this subject in order to learn more on the topic |
|
|
|
at hand participation through exercises would demonstrate more if learning |
|
|
|
takes place or not rather than simply through Quizzes although that would |
|
|
|
obviously help. |
|
|
|
- Although many students got an ‘F’ for the Quiz but this is significantly |
|
|
|
lower than the last Semester wherein 14 failed compared to 10 this time. |
|
|
|
On the number of students who got C or better, in comparison to the last |
|
|
|
semester this semester has an increase of 11.5% students who got C or |
|
|
|
better or an additional of 3 more students who got C or better. |
SLO#6 Discuss the |
SLO #4 |
I, D |
Number of students successful on this SLO |
methods of |
Demonstrate |
|
|
establishing table |
a solid |
|
|
relationships in the |
foundation |
|
|
database. |
skills in |
|
Assessment Type : Exam |
|
database |
|
|
|
design and |
|
10 of 24 students, or 41.67%, obtained a grade of C or higher. |
|
management, |
|
|
SLO#8 Explain the |
web |
|
A = 1, B =0, C = 9, D = 6, F = 8 |
importance of data |
engineering, |
|
|
programming, |
|
|
|
integrity in database |
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
design |
|
|
|
networking; |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assessment Type : |
|
|
|
17 of 24 students, or 70.83%, obtained a grade of C or higher. |
|
|
|
A = 9, B = 6, C = 2, D = 2, F = 5 |
Note : All students who got an ‘F’ at least miss one (1) exercise out of four
(4) exercises.
Level at which students were successful
Introduction (I), Demonstrate(D)
How SLO was assessed.
Formative: Class Participation,
Summative: Midterm Exam
|
|
|
Comments on Student Learning : |
|
|
|
- Instead of |
|
|
|
Midterm Exam. |
|
|
|
- The number of students who got C or better, in comparison to the last |
|
|
|
semester this semester improves from 30% to 41.67% or an increase from |
|
|
|
7 for the last semester to 10 this semester. |
SLO#10 Explain the |
SLO #4 |
I,D |
Number of students successful on this SLO |
anatomy of field |
Demonstrate |
|
|
specification in table |
a solid |
|
|
design. |
foundation |
|
|
|
skills in |
|
Assessment Type : Exam |
SLO#12 Explain the |
database |
|
|
anatomy of table |
design and |
|
6 of 24 students, or 25%, obtained a grade of C or higher. |
views in database |
management, |
|
|
design. |
web |
|
|
engineering, |
A = 1, B = 3, C = 2, D = 5, F = 13 |
programming, |
|
and |
|
networking; |
|
|
Assessment Type : |
|
18 of 24 students, or 75%, obtained a grade of C or higher. |
|
A = 10, B = 5, C = 3, D = 2, F = 4 |
|
Note : The students with an ‘F’ grade which are ten (10) of them, 9 out of |
|
10 did not make 3 out of 6 remaining exercises after midterm. |
|
Level at which students were successful |
|
Introduction (I), Demonstrate(D) |
Comments on Student Learning :
-Instead of
Final Exam.
Additional observations: Generally speaking there is a mark improvement on the number of passers on Quizzes, Exercises and Exams except for the Finals exam with one student less passer compared last semester.
Special comments:
Explanations on Course Grading :
Final Grades were computed as follows:
|
- |
50% |
|
Quizzes |
- |
10% |
|
Midterm Exam |
- |
20% |
|
Final Exam |
- |
20% |
|
|
|
||
TOTAL |
|
100% |
|
Grade Summary :
A = 1, B = 5, C = 6, D = 6, F = 6
Note : 12 out of 24 or 50% got C or higher
Recommendations: A new textbook that would focus more on RDBMS (Relational Database Management System) practical usage rather than the science of Database Design itself which is more suited for a
IS 240 – Internet and
SLO# |
Program |
I, D, M |
Reflection/Comment |
|
SLO# |
|
|
SLO#1 Describe the |
SLO #4 |
I |
Number of students successful on this SLO |
basics of the Internet |
|
|
|
– how it came about, |
Demonstrate |
|
Assessment Type : |
its capabilities, and |
a solid |
|
|
how information is |
foundation |
|
|
distributed across the |
skills in |
|
|
information |
database |
|
15 of 25 students, or 60%, obtained a grade of C or higher. |
superhighway. |
design and |
|
|
|
management, |
|
A = 0, B = 6, C = 9, D = 3, F = 7(2) |
|
web |
|
|
|
engineering, |
|
|
SLO#2 Demonstrate |
programming, |
|
|
an understanding of |
and |
|
Note : The ‘F’ grade 7(2) means 2 out of 7 failed to submit their exercise. |
the capabilities and |
networking; |
|
|
structure of HTML – |
|
|
|
the backbone of the |
|
|
|
World Wide Web. |
|
|
Assessment Type : Quiz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 of 25 students, or 28%, obtained a grade of C or higher. |
|
|
|
A = 1, B = 2, C = 4, D = 17, F = 11(2) |
Note : The ‘F’ grade 11(2) means 2 out of 11 did not took the Quiz.
Level at which students were successful
Introduction (I)
|
|
|
How SLO was assessed. |
|
|
|
Formative: Class Participation, |
|
|
|
Summative: |
|
|
|
Comments on Student Learning : |
|
|
|
- Two types of assessments were used, namely, a Quiz and |
|
|
|
Exercises simply because in this subject in order to learn more on the |
|
|
|
topic at hand participation through exercises would demonstrate more if |
|
|
|
learning takes place or not rather than simply through Quizzes although |
|
|
|
this is in no way downgrade the importance of Quizzes in assessing |
|
|
|
learning. |
SLO#3 Create a web |
SLO #2 |
I,D |
Number of students successful on this SLO |
page from scratch, |
|
|
|
using only HTML tags, |
Demonstrate |
|
|
including the ability to |
a solid |
|
|
adjust line spacing, |
foundation |
|
Assessment Type : |
background color, text |
skills in |
|
|
colors, and other |
database |
|
17 of 25 students, or 68%, obtained a grade of C or higher. |
important attributes. |
design and |
|
|
|
management, |
|
A = 15, B = 0, C = 2, D = 2, F = 6(2) |
|
web |
|
|
|
engineering, |
|
|
|
programming, |
|
|
|
and |
|
Note : All the student that has an ‘F’ grade, 2 out of 6 failed to submit |
|
|
|
|
|
networking; |
|
|
SLO#4 Use advanced |
their exercise. |
HTML tags to organize |
|
data into tables, insert |
|
images, hyperlink |
|
pages, and create |
Assessment Type : Exam |
electronic forms. |
|
|
14 of 25 students, or 56%, obtained a grade of C or higher. |
|
A = 1, B = 7, C = 6, D = 3, F = 8(1) |
Note : The ‘F’ grade 8(1) means 1 out of 8 students did not take the exam.
Level at which students were successful
Introduction (I), Demonstrate(D)
How SLO was assessed.
Formative: Class Participation, Exercises
Summative: Midterm Exam
Comments on Student Learning :
-Instead of
Midterm Exam.
SLO#9 Develop a high- |
SLO #2 |
I,D,M |
Number of students successful on this SLO |
quality, interactive |
|
|
|
web page utilizing the |
Demonstrate |
|
|
newest versions of |
a solid |
|
|
HTML, CSS and |
foundation |
|
Assessment Type : |
JavaScript. |
skills in |
|
|
|
database |
|
|
|
design and |
|
|
|
management, |
|
12 of 25 students, or 48%, obtained a grade of C or higher. |
|
web |
|
|
|
engineering, |
|
A = 9, B = 0, C = 3, D = 1, F = 12(12) |
|
programming, |
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
networking; |
|
|
|
|
|
Note : The ‘F’ grade 12(12) means 12 out of 12 did not do at least 1 out |
|
|
|
of 3 exercises and/or has withdrawn from the class. |
Assessment Type : Project
13 of 25 students, or 52%, obtained a grade of C or higher.
A = 10, B = 3, C = 0, D = 0, F = 12(10)
Note : The ‘F’ grade 12(10) means 10 out of 12 did not pass their final project and/or has withdrawn already from the class.
Assessment Type : Exam
8 of 25 students, or 32%, obtained a grade of C or higher.
A = 2, B = 2, C = 4, D = 0, F = 18(5)
Note : The ‘F’ grade 18(5) means 5 out of 18 did not took the exam or has already withdrawn from the class.
Level at which students were successful
Introduction (I), Demonstrate(D)
Comments on Student Learning :
-Despite the low percentage of passers on the final exam, it is still relatively higher compared to the last semester.
Additional observations: The new textbook as per recommendation last two semesters ago did not arrive this semester and even up to this point with all the
Special comments:
Explanations on Course Grading :
Final Grades were computed as follows:
|
- |
60% |
|
Quizzes |
- |
10% |
|
Midterm Exam |
- |
15% |
|
Final Exam |
|
- |
15% |
TOTAL |
100% |
Grade Summary :
A = 1, B = 6, C = 2, D = 4, F = 12(10)
Note : 9 out of 25 or 36% got C or higher. And 10 out of 12 who got an ‘F’ already either have withdrawn from the class and/or did not pass the final project.
Recommendation Comment : Adjust the number of exercises or minimize the number of exercises only to important ones so as to accommodate for the Final Project.
IS 260 – Business Information System / Fall Semester 2010 / 25
SLO# |
Program |
I, D, M |
Reflection/Comment |
|
SLO# |
|
|
SLO#1 Understand how |
SLO #2 |
I |
Number of students successful on this SLO |
computer hardware |
|
|
|
has evolved to its present level of sophistication
SLO#2 Know what innovations to expect in information technology
SLO#21 Understand the fundamentals of decision making and problem solving
Demonstrate theoretical knowledge and practical skills in the management and strategic use of information systems and technology.
Assessment Type :
22 of 25 students, or 88%, obtained a grade of C or higher. A = 11, B = 9, C = 2, D = 0, F = 3(2)
Note : The ‘F’ grade 3(2) means 2 out of 3 students who got an F failed to submit his/her exercise or has withdrawn from the class.
Assessment Type : Quiz
7 of 25 students, or 28%, obtained a grade of C or higher. A = 0, B = 2, C = 5, D = 9, F = 9(1)
Note: The ‘F’ grade 9(1) means 1 out of 9 students has already withdrawn from the class.
Level at which students were successful
Introduction (I)
How SLO was assessed.
Formative: Class Participation,
Summative:
|
|
|
Comments on Student Learning : |
|
|
|
- This class is a purely lecture class and as I observed in this College many |
|
|
|
of the students could not stand for even 30 minutes for a faculty to stand |
|
|
|
in front and discuss. So to make it more interesting and more interactive |
|
|
|
for students, I included |
|
|
|
would create a |
|
|
|
problem that is already defined for them. |
SLO#7 Learn the |
SLO #2 |
I, D |
Number of students successful on this SLO |
organizational context |
|
|
|
for systems |
Demonstrate |
|
|
development and use |
theoretical |
|
|
is changing from a |
knowledge |
|
Assessment Type : |
physical to a virtual |
and practical |
|
|
structure |
skills in the |
|
22 of 25 students, or 88%, obtained a grade of C or higher. |
|
management |
|
|
|
and strategic |
|
A = 6, B = 11, C = 5, D = 0, F = 3(3) |
|
use of |
|
|
|
information |
|
|
|
systems and |
|
|
SLO#13 Recognize the technology. |
Note : The ‘F’ grade 3(3) means 3 out of 3 students who got an F did not |
systems approach in |
do at least one exercise and/or has withdrawn from the class. |
solving systems |
|
problems of all kinds |
|
|
Assessment Type : Exam |
SLO#14 Understand |
11 of 25 students, or 44%, obtained a grade of C or higher. |
how systems |
|
development projects |
A = 4, B = 5, C = 2, D = 6, F = 8(1) |
are managed in top- |
|
down fashion |
|
|
Note : The ‘F’ grade 8(1) means 1 out of 8 students who got an F has |
|
already withdrawn from the class. |
Level at which students were successful
Introduction (I), Demonstrate(D)
How SLO was assessed.
Formative: Class Participation, Reporting
Summative: Midterm Exam
Comments on Student Learning :
-Instead of
Midterm Exam.
SLO#4 Recognize the |
SLO #5 |
I,D,M |
Number of students successful on this SLO |
importance and |
Demonstrate |
|
|
advantages of |
the ability to |
|
|
electronic commerce |
adapt to |
|
|
|
latest |
|
Assessment Type : Group Project |
|
technologies |
|
|
|
using their |
|
24 of 25 students, or 96%, obtained a grade of C or higher. |
SLO#10 Distinguish |
foundation |
|
|
between intranets, |
knowledge |
|
A = 17, B = 6, C = 1, D = 0, F = 1(1) |
and skills |
|
||
extranets, and the |
|
|
|
from CIS. |
|
|
|
internet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note : The ‘F’ grade 1(1) means one of the student has already withdrawn |
|
|
|
from the class and therefore has no project to begin with. |
SLO#12 Know the |
|
|
|
advantages and costs |
|
|
|
of database |
|
|
|
management systems |
|
|
Assessment Type : Exam |
|
|
|
13 of 25 students, or 52%, obtained a grade of C or higher. |
|
|
|
A = 0, B = 4, C = 9, D = 8, F = 5(1) |
Note : The ‘F’ grade 5(1) means 1 out of 5 students has already withdrawn from the class and therefore was not able to take the final exam.
Level at which students were successful
Introduction (I), Demonstrate(D)
Comments on Student Learning :
-Instead of
Exercise, Final Exam and an incremental Group Final Project.
Additional observations: The new textbook did not arrive as expected last Semester but hopefully come Spring 2011 the bookstore will be able to provide us with the new textbook.
Special comments: |
|
|
|
|
Explanations on Course Grading : |
|
|
|
|
Final Grades were computed as follows: |
|
|
|
|
- |
50% |
|
||
Quizzes |
|
- |
10% |
|
Midterm Exam |
|
- |
20% |
|
Final Exam |
|
|
- |
20% |
|
|
|
||
TOTAL |
100% |
|
|
|
Grade Summary : |
|
|
|
|
A = 4, B = 10, C = 9, D = 1, F = 1
Note : 23 out of 25 or 92% got C or higher and the one who got an ‘F’ grade has since withdrawn before the deadline of withdrawal of courses.
Recommendations: A Divisional server that would allow students do their project that connects to a mySQL Database that would not touch the Database in the main server at COM National Campus.
IS 280 – Introduction to Networking (Lecture) / Fall Semester 2010 / 19
SLO# |
Program |
I, D, M |
Reflection/Comment |
|
SLO# |
|
|
SLO#1 Discuss the |
SLO #4 |
I |
Number of students successful on this SLO |
history of networking. |
|
|
|
|
Demonstrate |
|
Assessment Type : |
|
a solid |
|
|
|
foundation |
|
|
SLO#2 Define |
skills in |
|
|
networking |
database |
|
15 of 19 students, or 78.9%, obtained a grade of C or higher. |
terminologies. |
design and |
|
|
|
management, |
|
A = 6, B = 9, C = 0, D = 1, F = 3(3) |
|
web |
|
|
|
engineering, |
|
|
SLO#3 Identify |
programming, |
|
|
networking theory and |
and |
|
Note : The ‘F’ grade 3(3) means 3 out of 3 students did not performed at |
established standards. |
networking; |
|
least one of their assigned exercise. |
Assessment Type : Quiz
9 of 22 students, or 26.3%, obtained a grade of C or higher. A = 0, B = 1, C = 4, D = 3, F = 11(1)
Note : The ‘F’ grade 11(1) means all 1 out of 11 did not take the Quiz.
Level at which students were successful
Introduction (I)
How SLO was assessed.
Formative: Class Participation,
Summative:
|
|
|
Comments on Student Learning : |
|
|
|
- This class is a purely lecture class and as I observed in this College many |
|
|
|
of the students could not stand for even 30 minutes for a faculty to stand |
|
|
|
in front and discuss. So to make it more interesting and more interactive |
|
|
|
for students, I included |
|
|
|
exercises are all |
|
|
|
on hardware exercise which is the province of the Lab class under Mrs |
|
|
|
Mangonon. |
SLO#4 Explain the |
SLO #2 |
I,D |
Number of students successful on this SLO |
implementation of |
|
|
|
Demonstrate |
|
|
|
area networking. |
a solid |
|
|
|
foundation |
|
Assessment Type : |
|
skills in |
|
|
|
database |
|
|
|
design and |
|
|
SLO#5 Identify network protocols and how they operate at all layers of the networking models.
management, |
12 of 19 students, or 63.15%, obtained a grade of C or higher. |
web |
|
engineering, |
A = 5, B = 6, C = 1, D = 2, F = 5(5) |
programming, |
|
and |
|
networking; |
|
|
Note : The ‘F’ grade 5(5) means 5 out of 5 students missed at least one |
|
exercise. |
Assessment Type : Exam
6 of 19 students, or 31.6%, obtained a grade of C or higher. A = 2, B = 1, C = 3, D = 6, F = 7(1)
Note : The ‘F’ grade 7(1) means 1 out of 7 students did not take the exam.
Level at which students were successful
Introduction (I), Demonstrate(D)
How SLO was assessed.
Formative: Class Participation, Exercises
Summative: Midterm Exam
Comments on Student Learning :
-Instead of
Midterm Exam.
SLO#5 Identify network |
SLO #2 |
I,D,M |
Number of students successful on this SLO |
protocols and how |
|
|
|
they operate at all |
Demonstrate |
|
|
layers of the |
a solid |
|
|
networking models. |
foundation |
|
Assessment Type : |
|
skills in |
|
|
|
database |
|
|
|
design and |
|
|
SLO#8 Identify |
management, |
|
13 of 19 students, or 68.42%, obtained a grade of C or higher. |
emerging technologies |
web |
|
|
that are expected to |
engineering, |
|
A = 8, B = 5, C = 0, D = 3, F = 3(2) |
impact the future of |
programming, |
|
|
networking. |
and |
|
|
|
networking; |
|
|
|
|
|
Note : The ‘F’ grade 3(2) means 2 of 3 students has at least missed one |
exercise and/or has already withdrawn from the class.
Assessment Type : Quiz
6 of 19 students, or 31.6%, obtained a grade of C or higher. A = 0, B = 3, C = 3, D = 5, F = 8
Assessment Type : Exam
2 of 22 students, or 63.16%, obtained a grade of C or higher. A = 7, B = 4, C = 1, D = 2, F = 5(1)
Note : The ‘F’ grade 5(1) means 1 out of 18 has already withdrawn from the class.
Level at which students were successful
Introduction (I), Demonstrate(D)
Comments on Student Learning :
-Looking back at the final exam result, I think I have to make a review
first before doing the final exam, so as to have a higher probability of passers.
Additional observations: The Final exam has tremendously improved compared to the last semester because of the review that I did before the final exam.
Special comments:
Explanations on Course Grading :
Final Grades were computed as follows: |
|
|
|
- |
50% |
|
|
Quizzes |
- |
10% |
|
Midterm Exam |
- |
20% |
|
Final Exam |
|
- |
20% |
|
|
||
TOTAL |
100% |
|
|
Grade Summary :
A =3, B = 7, C = 7, D = 1, F = 1
Note : 17 out of 19 or 89.47% got C or higher and the lone student who got an ‘F’ grade has already withdrawn from the class.
Recommendations: Probably change textbook to something that has a combination of hardware fundamentals and as well as networking. Many of the students in my last 2 years of teaching in Networking have hard time grasping theoretical concepts in networking specially on not so easy topics.
V.DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS
a. Initial Findings using direct assessments through CLAs (Course Level Assessments)
i.Change of textbook(s) that is/are more appropriate for
1.Textbook on Networking although a new one still would not fit on learning capability of the students here at the college. Additionally the laboratory part teaches hardware first before networking so normally lecture and
Recommendations – 1) A textbook that would focus on hardware and a basic on networking that is more
ii.Change of textbooks and/or course outlines that would allow easier transitions to other higher institutions like University of Hawaii and University of Guam to name just a few.
1.Textbook on IS230 or Database Design although is doing alright as far as fitting to the learning capability of the students here in the college but actually does not match content- wise on similar courses that are offered on higher institutions elsewhere like UH and UOG for example. The focus on the current textbook is more on the database software (i.e. MS Access) rather than the science of designing database. However, the challenge is to find a textbook that is mix (and balance as well) on having good focus on the essential contents on database design and that would match the learning capability of
our students here in our College.
Recommendations - 1) A new textbook that is a good mix of database design essentials and more tailored fit to our students capability here in COM. If this happens a change of course outline would also be in order. 2) Just stay with the current textbooks but add some Database Design concepts that are not part of the textbook but essential enough for the student’s learning (this is currently what I am doing right now).
2.Textbook on IS220 or Computer Science and Programming although a programming textbook (using VB.net) is more suited for higher years or is not normally offered as introductory programming language of choice for many schools including UH, UOG (and other US colleges) and even in the Philippines. UH for example uses C++ and UOG uses Java (although recently someone told me that they are now using C++) as introductory programming language. However, many of our students that are taking CIS when they go
abroad to study normally goes to UH.
Recommendation – 1) A new textbook on C++ (or Java) that fits our own need here.
b.Initial Findings using indirect assessments through program health indicators
i.
IS230=70.34
IS240=69.46
This website and all COM-FSM Internet based services are best viewed with Firefox 3.0 or better.
© Copyright 2020 College of Micronesia-FSM | Site Disclaimer
P. O. Box 159, Kolonia, Pohnpei, 96941 - (691) 320-2480
College of Micronesia-FSM is accredited by the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges,
Western Association of Schools and Colleges, 428 J Street., Suite 400 Sacramento, CA 95814, (415) 506-0234,
an institutional accrediting body recognized by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation and the U.S. Department of Education.
Additional information about accreditation, including the filing of complaints against member institutions, can be found at: www.accjc.org