- Our College
- Academics
- Student Services
- Public Reports
- Forum
- Library
- Quick Access
At the completion of Third Year Program in Accounting the student will be able to:
PSLO Assessment Report Summary
There are no program assessment data that are currently available, out of the previous cycle. The program was just revived last Spring.
The program opened again because students persistently requested for it, after they have realized their potential career advancement through this program.
The Third Year Program General Business assessment was focused on ACC_PLO_1, ACC_PLO_2, ACC_PLO_3, and ACC_PLO_4.
ACC_PLO_1 made use of the assessment data from AC 320. Advance Assignments served as Pre-tests, and Quizzes functioned as Post Tests. Both of these were used to assess the PSLO and CSLO.
ACC_PLO_2 made use of the assessment data from AC 325. Advance Assignments served as Pre-tests, and Quizzes functioned as Post Tests. Advance Assignments served as Pre-tests, and Quizzes functioned as Post Tests. Both of these were used to assess the PSLO and CSLO.
AC_PLO_3 made use of the assessment data from AC 335. Advance Assignments served as Pre-tests, and Quizzes functioned as Post Tests. Advance Assignments served as Pre-tests, and Quizzes functioned as Post Tests. Both of these were used to assess the PSLO and CSLO.
AC_PLO_4 made use of the assessment data from BU/MS 310. Multiple Choice Pre-tests and Quizzes (which served as Post Test) were used to assess the PSLO and CSLO’s.
ACC_PLO_1. Based on the results of the assessment activity, at the end of the semester, in general, 100% of the students were able to demonstrate an understanding of intermediate accounting principles by describing the financial reporting environment and the conceptual framework of financial accounting, analyzing assignments and financial statements in detail, and accounting for cash and receivables, and inventories. Their skills in property, plant and equipment and intangibles, liabilities, stockholders’ equity, and other special areas are yet to be assessed in AC 321.
ACC_PLO_2. The assessment activity results confirmed that in general, 100% of the students were able to demonstrate an understanding of cost accounting systems relevant to managerial-decision making, planning and control by solving problems involving various costing and budgeting methods; by applying financial, inventory and production management techniques in cost accounting; and by accurately measuring short- and long-term organizational performance.
ACC_PLO_3. The results of the assessment activity also show that in general,100% of the students demonstrated competence in analyzing and recording various transactions for state and local governments, the federal government, colleges and universities, and other nonprofit organizations; in preparing and interpreting financial statements; and in explaining differences between public and private sector accounting.
ACC_PLO_4. In this assessment activity, only 77% of the students were able to demonstrate their understanding of statistical methods of sampling and estimating population statistics. This course builds on students’ basic knowledge and skills in statistics (MS 150) in their AS Business degree. However, students found difficulty in the first two General CSLO’s.
Shown below is the summary of the assessment results
Major: |
Degree |
Term |
Chuuk |
Kosrae |
National |
Pohnpei |
Yap |
Students |
Accounting |
TYC |
Fall 2011 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
6 |
Accounting |
TYC |
Fall 2013 |
|
|
14 |
|
|
14 |
Accounting |
TYC |
Spring 2011 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
6 |
Accounting |
TYC |
Spring 2012 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
5 |
Accounting |
TYC |
Spring 2014 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
11 |
Major: |
Degree |
Term |
Chuuk |
Kosrae |
National |
Pohnpei |
Yap |
Credits |
Accounting |
TYC |
Fall 2011 |
|
|
69 |
|
|
69 |
Accounting |
TYC |
Fall 2013 |
|
|
177 |
|
|
177 |
Accounting |
TYC |
Spring 2011 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
60 |
Accounting |
TYC |
Spring 2012 |
|
|
60 |
|
|
60 |
Accounting |
TYC |
Spring 2014 |
|
|
105 |
|
|
105 |
Program |
Term |
Chuuk |
Kosrae |
National |
Pohnpei |
Yap |
Credits |
Accounting (TYC) |
Fall 2011 |
|
|
57 |
|
|
57 |
Accounting (TYC) |
Fall 2013 |
|
|
234 |
|
|
234 |
Accounting (TYC) |
Spring 2011 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
36 |
Accounting (TYC) |
Spring 2012 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
36 |
Accounting (TYC) |
Spring 2014 |
|
|
39 |
|
|
39 |
Major |
Degree |
Term |
CredEnrollAvg |
CredAttAvg |
CredEarnAvg |
TermGPAAvg |
Accounting |
TYC |
Fall 2011 |
11.5 |
10.0 |
9.5 |
2.09 |
Accounting |
TYC |
Fall 2013 |
12.6 |
12.6 |
11.1 |
2.31 |
Accounting |
TYC |
Spring 2011 |
10.0 |
8.0 |
8.0 |
1.98 |
Accounting |
TYC |
Spring 2012 |
12.0 |
12.0 |
12.0 |
3.29 |
Accounting |
TYC |
Spring 2014 |
9.5 |
9.5 |
9.5 |
3.75 |
Program |
Term |
Section |
EnrollMax |
Enrollment |
EnrollRatio |
AvgClassSize |
Accounting (TYC) |
Fall 2011 |
3 |
75 |
17 |
22.7% |
5.7 |
Accounting (TYC) |
Fall 2013 |
5 |
100 |
72 |
72.0% |
14.4 |
Accounting (TYC) |
Spring 2011 |
2 |
50 |
11 |
22.0% |
5.5 |
Accounting (TYC) |
Spring 2012 |
2 |
46 |
12 |
26.7% |
6.0 |
Accounting (TYC) |
Spring 2014 |
1 |
25 |
13 |
52.0% |
13.0 |
Major |
Degree |
Term |
Students |
ABCorP% |
ABCDorP% |
W% |
Accounting |
TYC |
Fall 2011 |
23 |
73.9% |
82.6% |
13.0% |
Accounting |
TYC |
Fall 2013 |
59 |
79.7% |
88.1% |
0.0% |
Accounting |
TYC |
Spring 2011 |
15 |
53.3% |
73.3% |
26.7% |
Accounting |
TYC |
Spring 2012 |
12 |
100.0% |
100.0% |
0.0% |
Accounting |
TYC |
Spring 2014 |
35 |
100.0% |
100.0% |
0.0% |
Program |
Term |
Students |
ABCorP% |
ABCDorP% |
W% |
Accounting (TYC) |
Fall 2011 |
19 |
63.2% |
78.9% |
10.5% |
Accounting (TYC) |
Fall 2013 |
78 |
76.9% |
83.3% |
6.4% |
Accounting (TYC) |
Spring 2011 |
12 |
66.7% |
91.7% |
8.3% |
Accounting (TYC) |
Spring 2012 |
12 |
100.0% |
100.0% |
0.0% |
Accounting (TYC) |
Spring 2014 |
13 |
100.0% |
100.0% |
0.0% |
Major |
Degree |
AY2010/11 |
AY2011/12 |
AY2012/13 |
AY2013/14 |
Accounting |
TYC |
5 |
3 |
|
|
Program Evaluation
Third Year Certificate in Accounting (TYC - Accounting)
As of October 31, 2011
Program Goals
The 3rd Year Certificate of Achievement in Accounting Program shall provide adequate technical skills and values training in the field of accounting that will enable the students achieve their goals, and help the FSM to attain economic development and self-reliance by:
These program goals came from Mission and Outcomes Development Worksheet for 3rd Year Certificate in Accounting submitted on August 7, 2008.
Program History
In response to the needs of the business community for local employees with adequate training in the field of accounting, the Business Administration Division proposed the Third Year Certificate in Accounting Program in 2001. The college approved this program for implementation in the same year. The degree was first offered in Fall 2001 (College Catalog, 2007-2009).
Program Description
The Business Administration Division manages organization The TYC in Accounting Program, along with the CIS and Business Programs.
Description This program is geared at equipping the students with the knowledge and skills in Cost, Government and Intermediate Accounting courses, Taxation and Applied Statistics with on-the-job training through Accounting Internship in order to meet local employment demand and the admission requirements for further studies abroad in the field of accounting.
Program Admission Requirements
Applicants for admission into this program must meet these requirements:
Program Degree Requirements
In addition to three courses or 9-unit credits in General Education Core Requirements, the following are the Major Core Requirements:
|
Course No. |
Course title |
Unit Credits |
AC 320 |
Intermediate Accounting I |
3 |
|
AC 321 |
Intermediate Accounting II |
3 |
|
AC 325 |
Cost Accounting |
3 |
|
AC 330 |
Taxation |
3 |
|
AC 335 |
Government Accounting |
3 |
|
AC 370 |
Accounting Internship |
3 |
|
BU/MS 310 |
Applied Statistics |
3 |
Program Courses and Enrollment
COURSE |
COURSE DESCRIPTION* |
PREREQUISITES* |
ENROLLMENT |
||||
2011 |
2010 |
2009 |
TOTAL |
AVERAGE |
|||
AC 320 |
This is a one-semester course that builds on the understanding of accounting principles developed in the 1st and 2nd accounting courses as well as managerial accounting. Topics include exploring the financial reporting environment, the conceptual framework of financial reporting; a detailed theoretical study of the financial statements; cash and receivables; inventories; property, plant and equipment (acquisition and depreciation/depletion) and of intangibles. |
AC 220 and AC 250 |
7 |
6 |
5 |
18 |
6.00 |
AC 321 |
This course is a continuation of the first intermediate accounting course. The course is intended to further develop the student's competence in financial reporting. Topics covered will include accounting for: short- and long-term liabilities and contingencies, receivables, investments, and stockholders' equity. Special topics such as income recognition and measurement of net assets; leases; the cash flow statement; accounting changes and errors; and post-employment benefits will also be covered. |
AC 320 |
3 |
6 |
7 |
16 |
5.33 |
AC 325 |
This is a one-semester course that covers cost accounting system output relevant to managerial decision-making, planning and control. The course builds on the foundation already established by the managerial accounting course completed by the student. Topics covered include absorption/variable costing and CVP analysis, relevant costing, budgeting, financial management, inventory and production management techniques, emerging management practices, responsibility accounting and transfer pricing, and measurement of short- and long-run organizational performance. |
AC 250 |
|
7 |
6 |
|
|
AC 330 |
This is a one-semester first tax course aimed at introducing students to a wide range of tax concepts and types of taxpayers. While the course mainly focuses on the taxation of business entities in both the United States and in the Federated States of Micronesia, it also covers individual taxation in the two countries - individuals as proprietors, shareholders, or partners in business entities, and as employees. |
AC 220 and AC 250 |
3 |
10 |
6 |
19 |
6.33 |
AC 335 |
This course is designed to be a survey of accounting for state and local governments, the federal government, colleges and universities, and other nonprofit organizations. It is expected that students will attain a basic understanding of accounting procedures in government and nonprofit organizations and appreciate the differences between private and public sector |
AC 250 |
6 |
3 |
6 |
15 |
5.00 |
AC 370 |
This is a one-semester course designed to further build on the understanding of accounting principles and apply the knowledge so obtained to everyday business transactions (accounting practices). This will include accounting for long-term liabilities and investments; preparation of the cash flow statement; financial statement (ratio) analysis and interpretation; accounting for departments and branches; and a 120-hour internship program. |
AC 320 |
2 |
6 |
5 |
13 |
4.33 |
BU/MS 310 |
The emphasis of the course is on the understanding of basic business math. This includes graphs, equations, ratio and proportion, percentage, and measurement systems to solve typical business problems such as the calculation of trade and cash discounts, markups, taxes, employee compensation, simple and compound interest, depreciation, inventory valuation, bonds and stocks, basic financial statement analysis, and business statistics |
MS 100 |
7 |
18 |
13 |
38 |
12.67 |
* College Catalog 2009-2011,
**http://www.comfsm.fm/national/administration/VPA/researchdocs/data.html
CORE COURSES |
PROGRAM LEARNING OBJECTIVES |
|||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
|
AC 320 |
I, D |
|
|
|
|
|
AC 321 |
M |
|
|
|
|
|
AC 325 |
|
I, D |
|
|
|
|
AC 330 |
|
|
M |
|
|
|
AC 335 |
|
|
|
I, D |
|
|
AC 370 |
M |
M |
M |
M |
M |
M |
BU/MS 310 |
|
|
|
|
|
M |
Legend:
I - introduced
D - developed and practiced with feedback
M - demonstrated adequate knowledge and skills appropriate for graduation
Program Faculty (for Spring and Fall 2011)
NAME |
DESIGNATION |
MASTER’S DEEGREE |
BACHELOR’S DEGREE |
PROFESSIONAL LICENSE |
|
Full-time Instructor / Chair, Math and Science Division – Pohnpei Campus |
Master in Business Administration, Virgen Milagrosa University |
Bachelor of Science in Mathematics, University of the Philippines |
|
MEDALLA, MARIAN G. |
Full-time Assistant Professor |
Master of Business Administration, Notre Dame of Dadiangas College |
Bachelor of Science in Accountancy, Mindanao State University |
Certified Public Accountant - Philippines since 2001 |
|
Full-time Assistant Professor |
Master of Business Administration, National College of Business and Arts |
Bachelor of Science in Commerce - Major in Accounting, St. Michael’s College of Laguna |
Certified Public Accountant - Philippines since 1982 |
Program Outcome Analysis
Program Enrollment
Fall |
Enrollment |
%Change |
2006* |
6 |
|
2007* |
8 |
33% |
2008* |
10 |
25% |
2009^ |
7 |
-30% |
2010^ |
4 |
-43% |
2011 ^ |
8 |
100% |
http://www.comfsm.fm/national/administration/VPA/researchdocs/data.html
^Instructors’ Class Lists
As can be gleaned from the foregoing table and further supported by the trend graph shown above, there is an erratic movement in the number of enrollees in the program. However, there was a dramatic increase in the enrollment in 2011.
By correlating the table above with both the graduation rate in the following page and further into the course completion rate information, the reasons for the changes in enrollment in certain terms may be partly attributed to the following:
Year |
CHANGE |
Possible Reasons |
2007* |
33% |
Also from the Graduation Rate in this page, although no one graduated in Spring 2006, but the graduation rate for Spring 2007 rose to 57%. |
2008* |
25% |
One reason for the increase can be credited to the average course completion rate of the previous school terms, 84% in Fall 2007 and 95% in Spring 2008. |
2009^ |
-30% |
After 2008, the policy of having a grade of “C” or better in all Business Courses was strictly implemented. |
2010^ |
-43% |
Although there was an improvement in the core course completion rates in 2009, but still some students refrained from pursuing a degree in this program because they perceived it as difficult |
2011^ |
100% |
The increase can be attributed to intensive campaigns done by AS Business instructors, convincing students to pursue their TYC degree in the college. |
*http://www.comfsm.fm/dev/irpo/datainfo.html
^Instructors’ Grading Sheets
Graduation Rate
Year |
SPRING |
||
Graduates |
Enrollment |
Rate |
|
2008* |
2 |
10 |
20% |
2009^ |
1 |
7 |
14% |
2010* |
4 |
10 |
40% |
2011* |
2 |
3 |
67% |
IRPO Graduates Academic Year 2.xlxs
^Instructor’s Invitation for Graduation
As what can be observed in the table above, there is an erratic trend in the number of graduates in relation to the number of enrollees in the program. This can be attributed to the following factors:
Average Class Size
Class Size |
||||||
|
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Total |
AC 320 |
6 |
8 |
10 |
5 |
6 |
35 |
AC 321 |
6 |
3 |
7 |
7 |
6 |
29 |
AC 325 |
5 |
8 |
9 |
6 |
7 |
35 |
AC 330 |
6 |
9 |
4 |
6 |
10 |
35 |
AC 335 |
5 |
8 |
9 |
6 |
3 |
31 |
AC 370 |
2 |
3 |
7 |
5 |
6 |
23 |
BU/MS 310 |
10 |
7 |
16 |
13 |
18 |
64 |
Total |
252 |
|||||
Divided by the Number of Classes Offered During the Period |
35 |
|||||
Average Class Size |
7.2 |
It should be noted that BU/MS 310 is also a major course requirement for TYC in General Business. Since there is inadequate information available as to the number of TYC in Accounting students actually enrolled in BU/MS 310, then we can just merely use these figures above as the average class size.
Since the ideal class size is 25 students in each class and the average number of students enrolled in each class is 7.2, it is evident that there is more than enough room for each student in class.
In all of five the classes handled by the Program Assessment Coordinator from Fall 2006 to date, all students had many chances to recite, do board work and make presentations. This is one advantage of classes having a small size.
Student Seat Cost
The college has not yet come up with a specific student seat cost.
Because of this, a rough estimate of the Average Seat Cost/Student was computed. This is computed by (1) deriving the ratio of the TYC Accounting Core Courses to the total number of classes offered by Business Division for the Academic Year 2010-2011, (2) apportion the total division budget based on the ratio in (1), and then finally, (3) divide the amount in (2) by the total number of students enrolled in all courses. The computation is shown in the table at the next page.
It must be noted that MS 150, which is offered from Fall to Summer with several sections, was not taken into consideration because it is a major requirement in most programs.
AVERAGE STUDENT SEAT COST Fall 2010-Summer 2011 |
|||
Business Division Courses |
Total Classes for the Year^, with 4-credit Courses as 2 Sections |
Ratio to Total Classes for the Academic Year |
Proportion to Total Business Division Budget ($238,312.00)* |
AC 131 |
10 |
13.51% |
|
AC 220 |
6 |
8.11% |
|
AC 250 |
2 |
2.70% |
|
AC 320 |
1 |
1.35% |
$3,220.43 |
AC 321 |
1 |
1.35% |
$3,220.43 |
AC 325 |
1 |
1.35% |
$3,220.43 |
AC 330 |
1 |
1.35% |
$3,220.43 |
AC 335 |
1 |
1.35% |
$3,220.43 |
AC 370 |
1 |
1.35% |
$3,220.43 |
BU 101 |
5 |
6.76% |
|
BU 250 |
2 |
2.70% |
|
BU 260 |
4 |
5.41% |
|
BU 270 |
3 |
4.05% |
|
BU 271 |
2 |
2.70% |
|
BU/MS 110 |
2 |
2.70% |
|
BU/MS 310 |
1 |
1.35% |
$3,220.43 |
CA 105 |
2 |
2.70% |
|
EC 220 |
3 |
4.05% |
|
EC 230 |
3 |
4.05% |
|
EC 320 |
1 |
1.35% |
|
FIN 312 |
1 |
1.35% |
|
IS 201 |
4 |
5.41% |
|
IS 220 |
2 |
2.70% |
|
IS 230 |
3 |
4.05% |
|
IS 240 |
3 |
4.05% |
|
IS 260 |
2 |
2.70% |
|
IS 270 |
1 |
1.35% |
|
IS 280 |
6 |
8.11% |
|
Total Classes |
74 |
|
|
Total Estimated Budget for the Program |
$22,543.03 |
||
Divided by Program's Student Population in All TYC Accounting Classes |
|
||
|
AC 320 |
6 |
|
AC 321 |
3 |
||
AC 325 |
7 |
||
AC 330 |
3 |
||
AC 335 |
3 |
||
AC 370 |
2 |
||
BU/MS 310 |
7 |
||
Total Program's Student Population |
31 |
||
AVERAGE SEAT COST |
$727.19 |
*COM-FSM Catalog, IRPO Enrollment Data and FY2011 Performance Budget
^http://www.comfsm.fm/myShark/
Course Completion Rate
AC 320 (Intermediate Accounting I)
AC 320 |
|
|
Year |
% of Students Earning C and Higher |
% of Students Earning D and Higher |
2006* |
60.00% |
60.00% |
2007* |
57.14% |
100.00% |
2008* |
10.00% |
40.00% |
2009^ |
80.00% |
80.00% |
2010^ |
33.33% |
100.00% |
* IRPO
^ Instructor’s grading sheet
It can be observed from the graph above that there was a significant drop of successful students in 2008, and that the difference between the % of students earning C and higher, and the % of students earning D and higher is 30%.
However, the success rates picked up in 2009 and 2010, although in 2010, most 2/3 of the students enrolled earned D.
Quality of Completion Rates
To have a better understanding of the characteristics of the success/failure rates of the students, let us concentrate on the breakdown of final grades for each semester and their respective percentages:
AC 320 |
Number |
Percentage |
||||||||||
Fall Term |
Fall Term |
|||||||||||
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Total |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Total |
|
A |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
B |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
20% |
0% |
0% |
40% |
0% |
9% |
C |
2 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
2 |
11 |
40% |
57% |
10% |
40% |
33% |
33% |
D |
0 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
10 |
0% |
43% |
30% |
0% |
67% |
30% |
F |
2 |
0 |
6 |
1 |
0 |
9 |
40% |
0% |
60% |
20% |
0% |
27% |
Total |
5 |
7 |
10 |
5 |
6 |
33 |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
AC 325
AC 325 |
|
|
Year |
% of Students Earning C and Higher |
% of Students Earning D and Higher |
2006 |
75.00% |
100.00% |
2007 |
77.78% |
88.89% |
2008 |
11.11% |
55.56% |
2009 |
100.00% |
100.00% |
2010 |
57.14% |
71.43% |
As what can be observed, just like in the previous program review, the significant drop in the success rate happened in 2008. In 2009, there was even a 100% success rate and then, in 2010 was reduced by less than 30%.
The success rate increased in 2010 because students in this class were determined to earn better grades. In 2009, the rate decreased because two students had a hard time balancing class and work pressures.
Looking further into the success rates of students in AC 325, let us focus on the percentages of students by their final grades:
AC 325 |
Number |
Percentage |
||||||||||
Fall Term |
Fall Term |
|||||||||||
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Total |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Total |
|
A |
0 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
0% |
11% |
0% |
17% |
0% |
6% |
B |
2 |
4 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
8 |
50% |
44% |
0% |
0% |
29% |
23% |
C |
1 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
11 |
25% |
22% |
11% |
83% |
29% |
31% |
D |
1 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
1 |
7 |
25% |
11% |
44% |
0% |
14% |
20% |
F |
0 |
1 |
4 |
0 |
2 |
7 |
0% |
11% |
44% |
0% |
29% |
20% |
Total |
4 |
9 |
9 |
6 |
7 |
35 |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
CONCLUSIONS ON OVERALL COMPLETION RATES OF COURSES OFFERED IN FALL:
By getting the average percentages of students earning final grades of A, B, C, D, F and Withdrawn by each semester, and by computing their respective percentages to the total, the table below can be constructed.
Fall Average Completion Rate |
Percentage |
|||||
Fall Term |
||||||
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Total |
|
A |
0% |
4% |
4% |
22% |
0% |
6% |
B |
30% |
29% |
4% |
30% |
10% |
21% |
C |
35% |
46% |
20% |
41% |
43% |
37% |
D |
15% |
18% |
29% |
0% |
27% |
18% |
F |
20% |
4% |
43% |
7% |
21% |
19% |
Total |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
AC 321
A. Success Rate Trend
AC 321 |
|
|
Year |
% of Students Earning C and Higher |
% of Students Earning D and Higher |
2006 |
66.67% |
66.67% |
2007 |
66.67% |
100.00% |
2008 |
100.00% |
100.00% |
2009 |
28.57% |
57.14% |
2010 |
83.33% |
100.00% |
The graph indicated a steady increase in success rates until 2009, and increased again in 2010. Please note that in 2009, the students who were very much challenged in AC 320 of the preceding term were the same ones enrolled in this course for this term.
B.Quality of Completion Rates
Now, let us examine the details of the success rates of students in AC 321 by relating the table below and the graph immediately after it.
AC 321 |
Number |
Percentage |
||||||||||
Spring Term |
Spring Term |
|||||||||||
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Total |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Total |
|
A |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
B |
3 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
7 |
50% |
33% |
14% |
14% |
17% |
24% |
C |
1 |
1 |
6 |
1 |
4 |
13 |
17% |
33% |
86% |
14% |
67% |
45% |
D |
0 |
1 |
0 |
2 |
1 |
4 |
0% |
33% |
0% |
29% |
17% |
14% |
F |
2 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
5 |
33% |
0% |
0% |
43% |
0% |
17% |
Total |
6 |
3 |
7 |
7 |
6 |
29 |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
As what can be seen on the table, the grade with the highest percentage is C (86%). Then, the same thing happened in 2010 (67%).
Then, it is followed by B (24%). In the year 2006, most students got B (50%). Then the following year, 33% of the students got B.
F placed 3rd highest percentage (17%). This is primarily because of the 43% failing rate in 2009, and 33% in 2006.
It is important to note that the average failing rate (17%) for this five-year is even greater than that of those getting D. This is even greater than the one in the previous program review (14%).
AC 330
A. Success Rate Trend
AC 330 |
|
|
Year |
% of Students Earning C and Higher |
% of Students Earning D and Higher |
2006 |
80.00% |
100.00% |
2007 |
88.89% |
100.00% |
2008 |
100.00% |
100.00% |
2009 |
33.33% |
50.00% |
2010 |
100.00% |
100.00% |
As what can be observed from the graph above, there was a very good success rate during this five-year period.
Except in 2009, there was a 100% success rate. More importantly, there was a 100% of students earning C and higher in 2008 and 2010.
The only snag in this otherwise remarkable success story is that in 2009, only half of the class passed the course. This is the batch of students who had so much difficulty overcoming a great obstacle – inadequate skills and competency in basic accounting courses.
B. Quality of Completion Rate
Now, let us take a peek at the quality of completion rates to have a more solid conclusion on the completion rates of this course.
AC 330 |
Number |
Percentage |
||||||||||
Spring Term |
Spring Term |
|||||||||||
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Total |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Total |
|
A |
1 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
20% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
3% |
B |
1 |
3 |
3 |
0 |
7 |
14 |
20% |
33% |
75% |
0% |
70% |
41% |
C |
2 |
5 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
13 |
40% |
56% |
25% |
33% |
30% |
38% |
D |
1 |
1 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
20% |
11% |
0% |
17% |
0% |
9% |
F |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
3 |
0% |
0% |
0% |
50% |
0% |
9% |
Total |
5 |
9 |
4 |
6 |
10 |
34 |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
As what can be noticed from the table above, most students got a grade of B in 2008 and 2010, with C close behind. In 2006 and 2007, most students got C, with B immediately trailing by.
It was just in 2009 when the failure rate equaled the success rate, with 50% of students earning F, 33% got C and 17% had D.
AC 370
A. Success Rate Trend
AC 370 |
|
|
Year |
% of Students Earning C and Higher |
% of Students Earning D and Higher |
2006 |
100.00% |
100.00% |
2007 |
100.00% |
100.00% |
2008 |
85.71% |
85.71% |
2009 |
100.00% |
100.00% |
2010 |
100.00% |
100.00% |
This course usually have a 100% success rate, except in 2008, because one student was not able to complete the internship period and he happened to form part 14% of the class.
B. Quality of Completion Rate
The success rate is better understood by looking at the breakdown of grades and their respective percentages.
AC 370 |
Number |
Percentage |
||||||||||
Spring Term |
Spring Term |
|||||||||||
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Total |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Total |
|
A |
2 |
1 |
2 |
5 |
0 |
10 |
100% |
14% |
29% |
83% |
0% |
37% |
B |
0 |
2 |
2 |
1 |
5 |
10 |
0% |
29% |
29% |
17% |
100% |
37% |
C |
0 |
4 |
2 |
0 |
0 |
6 |
0% |
57% |
29% |
0% |
0% |
22% |
D |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
F |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
1 |
0% |
0% |
14% |
0% |
0% |
4% |
Total |
2 |
7 |
7 |
6 |
5 |
27 |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
From the table in the preceding page and the trend graph shown above, there is a high tendency toward the grades A and B.
Some students who enrolled in this course got C (22%). The year 2007 (57%) provided the most number of students with this grade and then, 2008 follows closely behind with a 29% percentage.
It is also worth noting that there was only one student who failed this class.
BU/MS 310
A. Success Rate Trend
BU/MS 310 |
|
|
Year |
% of Students Earning C and Higher |
% of Students Earning D and Higher |
2006 |
100.00% |
100.00% |
2007 |
100.00% |
100.00% |
2008 |
100.00% |
100.00% |
2009 |
84.62% |
84.62% |
2010 |
100.00% |
100.00% |
Again, there could have been a 100% success rate, with most students earning C or higher. Only that in 2009, the success rate fell down to 84.62%.
B. Quality of Completion Rate
Let us then look closer at the composition of completion rates by analyzing the number and percentages of students’ grade from year to year.
BU/MS 310 |
Number |
Percentage |
||||||||||
Spring Term |
Spring Term |
|||||||||||
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Total |
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Total |
|
A |
6 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
20 |
67% |
29% |
29% |
31% |
22% |
33% |
B |
2 |
4 |
7 |
6 |
14 |
33 |
22% |
57% |
50% |
46% |
78% |
54% |
C |
1 |
1 |
3 |
1 |
0 |
6 |
11% |
14% |
21% |
8% |
0% |
10% |
D |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
0% |
F |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
2 |
0% |
0% |
0% |
15% |
0% |
3% |
Total |
9 |
7 |
14 |
13 |
18 |
61 |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
As what can be perceived from the table and graph above, the reason the trend was discontinued because two of the students in 2009 failed the class and they happen to be 15% of the class. Of the students who failed, one had a difficulty balancing her work-family-academic life, and the other was a returning student, who needed a lot of catching up for basic concepts she had already forgotten.
CONCLUSIONS ON OVERALL COMPLETION RATES OF COURSES OFFERED IN SPRING:
To further analyze the performance levels of the classes by semester, let us first get the total students from each course with final grades of A, B, C, D, F and Withdrawn, and solve for their respective percentages to the total.
Spring Average Completion Rate |
Percentage |
|||||
Fall Term |
||||||
2006 |
2007 |
2008 |
2009 |
2010 |
Total |
|
A |
47% |
11% |
14% |
29% |
6% |
21% |
B |
23% |
38% |
42% |
19% |
66% |
38% |
C |
17% |
40% |
40% |
14% |
24% |
27% |
D |
5% |
11% |
0% |
11% |
4% |
6% |
F |
8% |
0% |
4% |
27% |
0% |
8% |
Total |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
From the table above, it is obvious that most enrollees across the semesters earned a grade of B (38%). This is primarily because of the much highest percentages of the students this grade in 2007 and 2008.
Then, C closely follows with 27%. It cannot be more than the percentage of students getting B, because for most part of the five-year period, its percentage for the year is less than that of B’s percentages
The overall failure rate was only 8%, despite the 27% failing rate in 2009. This is because there were only 8% and 4% failing rate in 2006 and 2008, and 0% in 2007 and 2010.
Student Satisfaction Rate
***Data is not available.
Employment and Transfer Data
***There is no available information.
Program’s Student Learning Outcomes
Graduates of the TYC Accounting should be able to:
Student Learning Outcomes
The highlights of the Course Level Assessments are as follows:
Course |
Year |
Instructor’s Findings, Recommendations and Comments |
AC 320 |
2009 |
Increase the units of credit to 4 to give students more time to master the concepts through problem solving and to cover ALL the course content topics. |
AC 321 |
2009-11 |
Increase the units of credit to 4 to give students more time to master the concepts through problem solving and to cover ALL the course content topics. |
AC 325 |
2009 |
To increase class size/program enrollment, also target nontraditional students by offering modular accounting courses in Pohnpei Campus. After completing all modular accounting courses and required humanities courses, the student can graduate from the TYC Accounting degree. |
AC 330 |
2011 |
Either reduce the covered topics or increase credits |
AC 335 |
2009 |
The improvement in the overall class performance of the students were attributable to these factors: (1) providing them chart of accounts, (2) the increase in the standard for admission in the TYC Accounting Program, and (3) the attitudes of the students in helping each other out so they can all pass the course. |
AC 370 |
2009 |
To reduce absences in the workplace, consider offering this course in summer. |
BU/MS 310 |
2011 |
Review and reduce Student Learning Outcomes because not all of the 22 SLO's cannot all be measured; they cannot be finished within the term. The use of a computer laboratory for topics requiring the use of computers is necessary so that the instructor can facilitate and keep the ideal pace. Make CA 105 a course pre-requisite. |
Findings and Recommendations
1. Program Admission Requirements
Existing |
Recommendations |
Justification |
|
None Recommended |
|
|
None Recommended |
|
|
Repeated any or all of these accounting courses only twice with a minimum grade of B on the last try. To better apply this policy, 1. Advisors shall look in both the DEGREE COMPLETION AND ONLINE TRANSCRIPT of their advisees. |
This revision is primarily because of the tragedy that happened in Fall 2008, where a sizable percentage of students enrolled in the program for this term needed more skills in and mastery of 100 and 200 level accounting courses to prepare them for 300 level accounting courses. Some of these students managed to get admitted into the program even when they repeatedly took accounting courses and earn a grade of C and D, after failing the course on the first try and the nth attempt. The system requirement is for strict compliance with this policy, so that no student can take advantage of the SIS system’s weaknesses and limitations
|
|
None Recommended |
|
2.Program Degree Requirements
EXISTING |
RECOMMENDATIONS |
JUSTIFICATIONS |
|||||||
Course No. |
Course Title |
Unit Credits |
Prerequisites |
Course No. |
Course Title. |
Unit Credits |
Prerequisites |
Remarks |
|
AC 320 |
Intermediate Accounting I |
3 |
Accounting II and Managerial Accounting |
AC 320 |
Intermediate Accounting I |
4 |
Managerial Accounting |
|
Accounting II is one of the pre-requisite courses of Cost Accounting. To better train students, they need to have more time to solve and be exposed to as much types of problems, as much as possible. Although most students earned B and C, but then, they might still need a lot of catching up to do in higher level accounting courses, let alone obtain a professional license in foreign countries. |
AC 321 |
Intermediate Accounting II |
3 |
Intermediate Accounting I |
AC 321 |
Intermediate Accounting II |
4 |
Intermediate Accounting I |
|
For the same reason cited in the case of Intermediate Accounting I, it is important to build on the basic knowledge that students acquired in much more basic accounting courses and the more complex details of accounting for intangible assets, investments, liabilities, owner's equity and other special topics. This course shall have four units of credit so that the students will have enough time to sharpen their problem-solving skills (laboratory), with the guidance of their instructor. |
AC 325 |
Cost Accounting |
3 |
|
AC 322 |
Managerial Accounting |
4 |
|
|
There is a need to rename the Course Title because Managerial Accounting involves quantitative aspects of discharging managerial functions, which are discussed in this course. This change in the number of units is important because there is a need for the students to gain mastery in the course and enough time to sharpen their skills in problem solving through laboratory sessions. |
AC 330 |
Taxation |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
None recommended. |
|
AC 335 |
Government Accounting |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
None recommended. |
|
AC 370 |
Accounting Internship |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
None recommended. |
|
BU/MS 310 |
Applied Statistics |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Make CA 105 a prerequisite course. |
Students have difficulties applying spreadsheet application. |
|
Any Q & LR/WC & Humanities Course |
3 |
|
AC 340 |
Constructive Accounting |
3 |
AC 250 |
|
Constructive Accounting or otherwise known as forensic accounting will enable Third Year Students sharpen their knowledge in the nature and behavior of various accounts and hone their skills in reconstructing accounts. This course will prepare them in correction of errors and auditing, when a bachelor's degree in accounting will be offered sometime in the future. |
|
Any Q & LR/WC & Humanities Course |
3 |
|
CA 105 |
Data Analysis Using Spreadsheets |
3 |
|
|
This course will come in handy for FIN 312, and BU/MS 310 topics |
|
Any Q & LR/WC & Humanities Course |
3 |
|
FIN 312 |
Corporate Finance |
|
|
|
This course is as useful to General Business Majors as to Accounting Majors because a lot of important quantitative corporate decision-making tools, which are important to future audit/management consultants, are taken here. |
Findings |
Recommendations |
Justification |
|
Since there is a unconfirmed proposal to totally scrap the program, and that students openly voice out their concerns on the difficulty of successfully graduating from the program,
|
|
AC 320 |
|
This is to further enable students to sharpen their problem-solving skills,
These recommendations are for the same reasons stated in the previous page. |
|
|
For the same reason stated in the previous page, and to enable students to earn their degree whenever work-family life would permit. |
|
|
This is to have a uniform seat cost computation. |
Findings |
Recommendations |
Justification |
There are no data on student satisfaction rate that are readily available |
The VPIA shall designate people who shall determine measures of and gather information on student satisfaction. |
It is very important that the objectivity of the person conducting the survey on student satisfaction so that there will be less questions as to the reliability and validity of the results. |
Findings |
Recommendations |
Justification |
There is no data available on employment of graduates. |
The Alumni Office shall be strengthened so that it can keep track of alumni updates from them on a yearly basis. This office shall also analyze the data and provide this information to the IRPO every year. The IRPO shall ensure that this data shall be available to interested users at any time through the net. |
This data is very important so that the college will be able to monitor the employability of its graduates, it can provide employment support and facilitate better networking among CCM/COM graduates. |
Findings |
Recommendations |
Justification |
Data on employer satisfaction rate is not available. |
The college shall also yearly check with the government and the private sector the latter’s current employment needs in their respective accounting divisions so that there shall be other means of reassessing this program. This person shall periodically report the same to the VPIA, who shall furnish the same to Business Division Chair for appropriate action. This same report shall also be furnished to the IRPO so that it may be available to certain internet users. |
There is a need for the college to annually gather information on employer satisfaction of fresh graduates of this program so that it will have a more solid basis on assessing the quality of graduates and their ability to meet the skills and knowledge requirements of the employers on the job. |
Findings |
Recommendations |
Justification |
Transfer rate data is also not available to date. |
The Alumni Office, along with the Office of the Admissions and Records, shall be given a boost in order that data on student transfer shall be provided to the IRPO every semester. Data required shall include reasons for transfer and other information related to transfer from the college. The IRPO shall take charge of distributing this data to interested users at any time. |
This information is very much needed because dissatisfaction as to the quality of education provided by the college may not be available from student satisfaction survey. This is also needed to keep track of students who transfer to other institutions of higher learning abroad and those who transfer to universities in other nations while without finishing their degree in COM. |
Findings |
Recommendations |
Justification |
It is just recently that this Program is evaluated to comply with the requirements of the WASC Accreditation Committee. |
The Program shall be reviewed once every two years |
A periodic review is necessary to make sure that this Program can meet the current job market demand and satisfy transfer requirements for institutions to which graduates regularly transfer. This is also necessary so that it can be updated with the new trends in business and accounting. In addition, a periodic review is necessary because it will enable the working committee on any proposed changes in the curriculum make appropriate suggestions to accommodate offering a bachelor’s degree program in accounting. |
This website and all COM-FSM Internet based services are best viewed with Firefox 3.0 or better.
© Copyright 2020 College of Micronesia-FSM | Site Disclaimer
P. O. Box 159, Kolonia, Pohnpei, 96941 - (691) 320-2480
College of Micronesia-FSM is accredited by the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges,
Western Association of Schools and Colleges, 428 J Street., Suite 400 Sacramento, CA 95814, (415) 506-0234,
an institutional accrediting body recognized by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation and the U.S. Department of Education.
Additional information about accreditation, including the filing of complaints against member institutions, can be found at: www.accjc.org