- Our College
- Academics
- Student Services
- Public Reports
- Forum
- Library
- Quick Access
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Course title: |
||
Campus: |
Initiator: |
Date: |
Course description: |
COURSE HOURS/CREDITS:
Hours per Week |
|
No. of Weeks |
|
Total Hours |
|
Semester Credits |
||||
Lecture |
3 |
x |
16 |
x |
48/16 |
= |
3 |
|||
Laboratory |
|
x |
|
x |
/48 |
= |
|
|||
Workshop |
|
x |
|
x |
/48 |
= |
|
|||
Co-op |
|
x |
|
x |
/32 |
= |
|
|||
Total Semester Credits |
3 |
PURPOSE OF COURSE:
[X] Degree requirement
[ ] Degree elective
[ ] Certificate
[ ] Other
PREREQUISITES: None
PSLOs OF OTHER PROGRAMS THIS COURSE MEETS:
PSLO# |
Program |
CAC Chair signatures:__________ Date recommended:_________
VPIA signature:___________ Date approved:____________
1. INSTITUTIONAL STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES (Check all that apply and are linked to the course student learning outcomes.)
[X] | 1. Effective oral communication: capacity to deliver prepared, purposeful presentations designed to increase knowledge, to foster understanding, or to promote change in the listeners’ attitudes, values, beliefs, or behaviors. |
[ ] | 2. Effective written communication: development and expression of ideas in writing through work in many genres and styles, utilizing different writing technologies, and mixing texts, data, and images through iterative experiences across the curriculum. |
[X] | 3. Critical thinking: a habit of mind characterized by the comprehensive exploration of issues, ideas, artifacts, and events before accepting or formulating an opinion or conclusion. |
[X] | 4. Problem solving: capacity to design, evaluate, and implement a strategy to answer an open-ended question or achieve a desired goal. |
[X] | 5. Intercultural knowledge and competence: a set of cognitive, affective, and behavioral skills and characteristics that support effective and appropriate interaction in a variety of cultural contexts. |
[X] | 6. Information literacy: the ability to know when there is a need for information, to be able to identify, locate, evaluate, and effectively and responsibly use and share that information for the problem at hand. |
[X] | 7. Foundations and skills for life-long learning: purposeful learning activity, undertaken on an ongoing basis with the aim of improving knowledge, skills, and competence. |
[X] | 8. Quantitative Reasoning: ability to reason and solve quantitative problems from a wide array of authentic contexts and everyday life situations; comprehends and can create sophisticated arguments supported by quantitative evidence and can clearly communicate those arguments in a variety of formats. |
PROGRAM STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES (PSLOs): The student will be able to:
COURSE STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES (CSLOs) (General): The student will be able to:
COURSE STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES (CSLOs) (Specific): The student will be able to:
CSLO (General) 1: Describe the basics of planning, implementing, and evaluating health promotion programs | |||
Student Learning Outcomes (specific) | ISLO | PSLO | Assessment Strategies |
1.1 Identify and explain each of the social issues and health problems with multiple and interacting determinants |
1, 3, 5, 6 | 3, 6, 7, 9 |
Individual oral presentation in Direct and multiple choice |
1.2 Describe the heterogeneous nature of human population each with its unique culture, traditions, politics, demographic composition and socioeconomic conditions |
1, 3, 5, 6 | 3, 6, 7, 9 |
Individual oral presentation in Direct and multiple choice |
1.3 Outline the instruments, techniques, and methods used in planning, implementation and evaluating health promotion programs |
1, 3, 6, 7 | 2, 5, 9 |
Individual oral presentation in Direct and multiple choice |
CSLO (General) 2: Apply range of theoretical and practical skills needed to plan, implement, and evaluate health promotion programs in a variety of settings | |||
Student Learning Outcomes (specific) | ISLO | PSLO | Assessment Strategies |
2.1 Explain how students perceive the increasingly sophisticated and demanding target audiences for assessments and intervention |
1, 3, 4, 6 | 1, 2, 5 |
Individual oral presentation in response to direct questions assessed by a rubric Direct and multiple choice questions as part of examinations and quizzes given during the semester |
2.2 Explain why there is the need to reconcile and integrate scientific evidence from afar with idiosyncratic data and preferences from the local situation |
3, 4, 7 | 2, 9 |
Practice sets graded based on an answer key Simulation group work graded by peer assessment rubric Direct and multiple choice questions as part of examinations and quizzes given during the semester |
2.3 Demonstrate the skills necessary to plan and implement health promotion intervention effectively and to evaluate their outcome | 3, 4, 7 | 1/4/9 |
Case Scenario discussions assessed with a rubric Simulation work group graded by peer assessment rubric |
CSLO (General) 3: Describe and discuss how basic health promotion activities fit into the overall activities of a specific population group or network | |||
Student Learning Outcomes (specific) | ISLO | PSLO | Assessment Strategies |
3.1 Describe and give examples on how basic health promotion principles and activities fit into the overall activities of a specific population group in a given case study | 1, 3, 4 | 1, 4, 9 |
Individual oral presentation in response to direct questions assessed by a rubric Problem based learning sets graded based on an answer key Direct and multiple choice questions as part of examinations and quizzes given during the semester |
3.2 Explain how comprehensive the health promotion activities are in each of the case study examples | 1, 3, 4, 7 | 1/4/9 |
Individual oral presentation in response to direct questions assessed by a rubric Problem based learning sets graded based on an answer key Direct and multiple choice questions as part of examinations and quizzes given during the semester |
3.3 Comment on the outcomes [both successes and failures] of each given case study | 1, 3, 4*, 8 | 5/9 |
Individual oral presentation in response to direct questions assessed by a rubric Problem based learning sets graded based on an answer key Direct questions as part of examinations and quizzes given during the semester |
CSLO (General) 4: Draw conclusions and lessons from the health promotion programs and cases, particularly those that do not fit in easily with a broad approach to health promotion | |||
Student Learning Outcomes (specific) | ISLO | PSLO | Assessment Strategies |
4.1 Identify lessons learnt from each health promotion program/case study within the Pacific context | 1, 5, 7, 8 | 5, 6, 9 |
Individual oral presentation in response to direct questions assessed by a rubric Problem based learning sets graded based on an answer key Direct and multiple choice questions as part of examinations and quizzes given during the semester |
4.2 Identify and explain the different issues in health promotion program and how to overcome such issues and implement them in the local context | 1, 5, 7, 8 | 1, 4, 9 |
Individual oral presentation in response to direct questions assessed by a rubric Problem based learning sets graded based on an answer key Direct questions as part of examinations and quizzes given during the semester |
COURSE CONTENTS
METHODS OF INSTRUCTION
[X] Lecture [ ] Cooperative learning groups
[ ] Laboratory [ ] In-class exercises
[ ] Audio visual [ ] Demonstration
[ ] Other
REQUIRED TEXT(S) AND COURSE MATERIALS:
McKenzie JF. et al. (2016). Planning, implementing and evaluating health promotion programs: A primer (7th ed.). San Francisco, California: Benjamin Cummings.(Or most recent edition
REFERENCE MATERIALS:
9.INSTRUCTIONAL COSTS:
None
10. EVALUATION:
Students must have a grade of 70%[C] or better to pass this course.
11. CREDIT BY EXAMINATION
None
PH 241 Case Studies and Special Issues in Health Promotion | Approved by VPIA: 04/08/22 |
This website and all COM-FSM Internet based services are best viewed with Firefox 3.0 or better.
© Copyright 2020 College of Micronesia-FSM | Site Disclaimer
P. O. Box 159, Kolonia, Pohnpei, 96941 - (691) 320-2480
College of Micronesia-FSM is accredited by the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges,
Western Association of Schools and Colleges, 428 J Street., Suite 400 Sacramento, CA 95814, (415) 506-0234,
an institutional accrediting body recognized by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation and the U.S. Department of Education.
Additional information about accreditation, including the filing of complaints against member institutions, can be found at: www.accjc.org