- Our College
- Academics
- Student Services
- Public Reports
- Forum
- Library
- Quick Access
Program Evaluation
Fall 2008 – Spring 2011
Programs Evaluated:
This program evaluation covers the following programs;
Associate of Applied Science Degree in Telecommunication Technology
Its primary purpose is to provide students with marketable entry-level skills in the telecommunication industry or any related field/career. It is designed to qualify students to take external licensure, vendor-based, or skill standards examinations in the field. If standardized external exams are not available in the field of study, the program prepares students at skill levels expected of employees in an occupation found in the local economy.
Program Learning Outcomes (PLO)
On the program completion, the successful graduate will be able to:
The program was created by recommendations of Pohnpei Campus Advisory Council to offer a certificate of achievement (COA) in electronics to train local students to acquire skills in maintaining and repairing of electronic equipment and devices which was a needed skill in the community and the local workforce.
Milestones:
Associate of Applied Science Degree in Telecommunication Technology
Maintenance, troubleshooting, repairing and modifying Telecommunication equipment and systems is the base for a career as a technician in this high-tech field. Telecommunications is one of the fastest growing industries in the world. The computer and information technologies are driving the need for more telecommunications services. The academic course work, technical skills training and practical experience available in this program prepare the student for positions within the industry. Training on and with the state of the art computer aided instruction system at COM-FSM will provide the technical edge needed in today’s telecommunications industry. Embedded within the program are three separate exit points, Certificate of Achievement in Electronics Engineering Technology, Advance Certificate in Telecommunications Technology and the Associate of Applied Science in Telecommunication Technology.
Associate of Applied Science Degree in Electronic Technology
Maintenance, troubleshooting, repairing and modifying electronic equipment and systems is the base for a career as a technician in this high-tech field. The academic course work, technical skills training and practical experience available in this program prepares students for employment as technicians in this rapidly growing industry. Training on and with the state of the art computer aided instruction system at COM-FSM will provided the technical edge needed in today’s electronic industry. Embedded within the program are three separate exit points, Certificate of Achievement in Electronic Engineering Technology, Advance Certificate in Electronics Technology and on completion the Associate of Applied Science in Electronics Technology.
Figure 1, show the entry and exit points for both electronics and telecommunication program.
Both programs are structured to begin their course offerings at the certificate level (Certificate of Achievement in Electronic Engineering Technology). Therefore, the admission requirements for both programs follow the same the admission requirements for all certificates of achievement programs as offered by the College in which students must complete high school education or equivalence to enter in either program.
Students must be admitted into degree programs based on the results of the College of Micronesia-FSM Entrance Exam (COMET) to further their studies into the Advanced Certificate and Associate of Applied Science degree. Students who are admitted into the programs as certificate bound status must change their status to degree bound by retaking and passing the COMET into the degree programs.
Certificate of Achievement in Electronic Engineering Technology
General Education Core Requirements……………………………..15 credits Mathematics (8 credits)
MS 104 Technical Math I (4)
MS 106 Technical Math II (4)
Computer Applications (3 credits)
CA 100 Computer Literacy (3)
Natural Science (4 credits)
Any Science with lab: [preferably SC130 Physical Science]
Technical Requirements………………………………...…………….22 credits VEE 103 Electronic Fundamentals I (3)
VSP 121 Industrial Safety (1.5)
VEE 100 Soldering and Mechanical Termination Techniques (1.5) VEM 110 Workshop Fabrications (3)
VEE 104 Electronic Fundamentals II (4) VEE 110 Discrete Devices I (3)
VEE 125 Electronic Circuits (3)
VEE 135 Digital Electronics I (3)
Total Requirements…………………….………………………….. . 37 credits
Advanced Certificate in Telecommunication Technology
General Education Requirements …………………………………... 3 credits English (3 credits)
EN 123 Technical Communications (3)
Technical Requirements …………………………….………...……. 11 credits VEE 230 Radio Communications (3)
VEE 235 Digital Electronics II (3) VEE 240 Signal Processing (3)
Technical Elective (2)
(Student may choose any technical course subject to approval by division)
VEE 250 Co-operative Education (2)
VTE 281 Cellular Phone Repairs (3)
Sub Total Requirements …………………………..……………..…… 14 credits
Certificate of Achievement ……………………………………….….. 37 credits
Total Requirements ………………………………………………… 51 credits
Associate of Applied Science in Telecommunication Technology
General Education Requirements ………………………………….… 4 credits Humanities (3)
Any course in art, music, history, language, philosophy (3)
Physical Education (1)
Any Physical Education course
Major Technical Requirements ………………..……………………. 12 credits VTE 260 Microwaves (3)
VTE 261 Fiber Optics Installations (3) VTE 270 Telecommunication Systems (3) VTE 280 Telephone Systems (3)
Sub Total Requirements ……………………………………………….. 16 credits
Advanced Certificate …………………...……………………………… 51 credits
Graduation Requirements ………………………...……..……….….. 67 credits
Advanced Certificate in Electronic Technology
General Education Requirements …………………………………… 3 credits English (3 credits)
EN 123 Technical Communications (3)
Technical Requirements ……………………………………………. 12 credits VEE 223 PC Hardware & Software (4)
VEE 222 Discrete Devices II (3)
VEE 235 Digital Electronic II (3)
Technical Elective (2)
(Student may choose any technical course subject to approval by division)
VEE 250 Cooperative Education (2) VTE 261 Fiber Optics Installations (3)
Sub Total Requirements ……………………………………………… 15 credits
Certificate of Achievement …………………………………………… 37 credits
Total Requirements ………………………………………………… 52 credits
Associate of Applied Science in Electronic Technology
General Education Requirements …………………………….………. 4 credits Humanities (3)
Any course in art, music, history, language, philosophy (3)
Physical Education (1)
Any Physical Education course
Technical Major Requirements …………………………..………… 11 credits VEE 224 Video Systems & Product Servicing (4)
VEE 225 Business Machines & Servicing (4) VEE 240 Signal Processing (3)
Sub Total Requirements ……………………………………………….. 15 credits
Graduation Requirements ……..…………………………………….. 67 credits
Source: COM-FSM General Catalog
Electronics program and Telecommunication program course requirements are depicted in table 1 and table 2 respectively.
Technical Requirements General Education Requirements
VSP121 Industrial Safety EN123 Technical Communication
VEM110 Workshop Fabrication MS104 Technical Math I
VEE100 Soldering & Termination Tech. MS106 Technical Math II
VEE103 Electronic Fundamentals I CA100 Computer Literacy
VEE104 Electronic Fundamentals II Humanities
VEE110 Discrete Devices I Science with lab
VEE135 Digital Electronics I Physical Education
VEE222 Discrete Devices II
VEE223 PC Hardware & Software
VEE235 Digital Electronics II
VEE224 Video Systems & Servicing
VEE225 Business Machine Servicing
VEE240 Signal Processing
Elective
Table 1. Electronics technology program courses
Source: COM-FSM General Catalog
Telecommunication Technology
Technical Requirements General Education Requirements
VSP121 Industrial Safety EN123 Technical Communication
VEM110 Workshop Fabrication MS104 Technical Math I
VEE100 Soldering & Termination Tech. MS106 Technical Math II
VEE103 Electronic Fundamentals I CA100 Computer Literacy
VEE104 Electronic Fundamentals II Humanities
VEE110 Discrete Devices I Science with lab
VEE135 Digital Electronics I Physical Education
VEE230 Radio Communications
VEE235 Digital Electronics II
VEE240 Signal Processing
VTE261 Fiber Optics Installation
VTE265 Microwave
VTE270 Telecommunication Systems
VTE280 Telephone Systems
Elective
Table 2. Telecommunication program courses
Source: COM-FSM General Catalog
Table 3, show the courses offered for each semester from fall 2008 to spring 2011. In the
100s’ courses, there are instances the classes are divided in two section to meet the classroom size, equipment availability and safety concerns however in the 200s’ courses the number of enrolled student decreases because the two cohorts (electronics program students and telecommunication students) degree bound started to take major technical courses on their respective major of specialization. Furthermore student who have not pass the COMET is no longer allowed to take 200’s courses. Also same thing happen on the student who have not pass the prerequisite of the 200s’ courses.
Course |
Fall 08 |
Spring 09 |
Fall 09 |
Spring 10 |
Fall 10 |
Spring 11 |
VEE100 |
23( divided |
|
|
|
44( divided |
|
|
in three |
|
|
|
in three |
|
|
sections) |
|
|
|
sections) |
|
VEE103 |
29( divided |
|
14 |
|
11 |
|
|
in two |
|
|
|
|
|
|
sections) |
|
|
|
|
|
VEE110 |
27( divided |
21( divided |
|
|
|
|
|
in two |
in two |
|
|
|
|
|
sections) |
sections) |
|
|
|
|
VEE104 |
|
18 |
|
24( divided |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in two |
|
|
|
|
|
|
sections) |
|
|
VEM110 |
|
|
20( divided |
22( divided |
|
|
|
|
|
in two |
in two |
|
|
|
|
|
sections) |
sections) |
|
|
VEE135 |
|
21( divided |
|
24( divided |
|
39( divided |
|
|
in two |
|
in two |
|
in two |
|
|
sections) |
|
sections) |
|
sections) |
VEE222 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
VEE223 |
14 |
|
10 |
|
|
|
VEE224 |
|
13 |
|
6 |
|
14 |
VEE225 |
7 |
9 |
|
3 |
|
13 |
VEE230 |
13 |
|
6 |
|
|
10 |
VEE235 |
15 |
|
12 |
|
15 |
|
VEE240 |
|
13 |
7 |
|
12 |
|
VEE250 |
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
VTE260 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
VTE261 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
VTE270 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
VTE280 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
VTE281 |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
Table 3. Course enrollment rate by semester
Source: Program instructors class record book.
Full time faculty
1. Gardner Edgar – Division Chairman, Assistant professor
BS in Technology, Texas University
2. Nelchor Permitez – Associate Professor
BSIE major in Electronics
MIST, Philippines
Master of Education (M.Ed.) major in Educational management
MIST, Philippines
Doctor of Education (Ed.D.) major in Educational management, EARIST, Philippines
Part time faculty
1. Grilly Jack Vocational Director
USDOL Journeyman Certificate in Electrical
U.S. Marine Corps Journeyman Certificate in Electrical
2. Bradley Henry PUC Supervisor
The table below indicates the enrollment data for the programs.
Semester |
COA EET |
AAS ET |
AAS TT |
Total |
Fall 2008 |
29 |
17 |
8 |
54 |
Spring 2008 |
22 |
14 |
12 |
48 |
Summer 2009 |
14 |
11 |
7 |
32 |
Fall 2009 |
34 |
15 |
7 |
56 |
Spring 2010 |
36 |
12 |
13 |
61 |
Summer 2010 |
21 |
12 |
8 |
41 |
Fall 2010 |
43 |
14 |
13 |
70 |
Spring 2010 |
1 |
27 |
30 |
56 |
Spring 2011 |
62 |
61 |
60 |
183 |
Table 5. Electronics program and Telecommunication program enrollment per semester.
Source: OAR Pohnpei Campus and IRPO data in COM-FSM website.
Figure 2. Graphical distribution of Electronics and Telecommunication program enrollment per semester.
2. Graduation Rate
Table 6, show the number of degree graduates from spring 2008 to spring 2010. Despite of the figures shown in table 5, the graduate turn out for both program (Electronics technology and Telecommunication technology) is low.
Programs |
Sp08 |
Su08 |
Fa08 |
Sp09 |
Su09 |
Fa09 |
Sp10 |
Sp11 |
Total |
Electronic Technology |
2 |
0 |
2 |
3 |
0 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telecommunication |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
Table 6. Electronics and Telecommunication program graduation rate
Source: OAR Pohnpei Campus and IRPO data COM-FSM website.
Furthermore, the structure of the program which allows certificate level students to continue to a degree level started with many students (30 two cohorts) due to difficulties of passing the required courses because of the students low cognitive achievement or academic skills it is likewise the reason that makes the transition from certificate to degree level is low.
3. Average Class Size
The ideal class size for each course was base on room size, equipment and safety concerns. Minimum is ten (10) and maximum is fifteen (15). There are some cases the class size exceed on its maximum to accommodate graduating students.
4. Students’ Seat Cost
No available data gather from Campus IC, Technology and Trade Division chair and IRPO.
5. Course Completion Rate for the Program
Course |
Fall |
Spring |
Fall |
Spring |
Fall |
Spring |
Mean |
|
08 |
09 |
09 |
10 |
10 |
11 |
percentile |
VEE100 |
20 out |
|
|
|
39 out |
|
88% |
|
of 23, |
|
|
|
of 44, |
|
|
|
87% |
|
|
|
89% |
|
|
VEE103 |
23 out |
|
11 out |
|
11 out |
|
86% |
|
of 29, |
|
of 14, |
|
of 11, |
|
|
|
79% |
|
80% |
|
100% |
|
|
VEE110 |
23 out |
18 out of |
|
|
|
|
73% |
|
of 27, |
24, 61% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
85% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
VEE104 |
|
11 out of |
|
21 out of |
|
|
74% |
|
|
18, 61% |
|
24, 87% |
|
|
|
VEM110 |
|
|
20 out |
20 out of |
|
|
95% |
|
|
|
of 20, |
22, 90% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
VEE135 |
|
16 out of |
|
23 out of |
|
36 out of |
88% |
|
|
21, 76% |
|
24, 95% |
|
39, 92% |
|
VEE222 |
|
|
|
|
12 out |
|
80% |
|
|
|
|
|
of 15, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80% |
|
|
VEE223 |
13 out |
|
8 out |
|
|
|
87% |
|
of 14, |
|
of 10, |
|
|
|
|
|
93% |
|
80% |
|
|
|
|
VEE224 |
|
12 out of |
|
5 out of |
|
13 out of |
89% |
|
|
13, 92% |
|
6, 83% |
|
14, 93% |
|
VEE225 |
7 out of |
8 out of |
|
3 out of |
|
11 out of |
94% |
|
7, |
9, 90% |
|
3, 100% |
|
13, 85% |
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
VEE230 |
13 out |
|
6 out |
|
|
10 out of |
100% |
|
of 13, |
|
of 6, |
|
|
10, 100% |
|
|
100% |
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
VEE235 |
15 out |
|
12 out |
|
13 out |
|
96% |
|
of 15, |
|
of 12, |
|
of 15, |
|
|
|
100% |
|
100% |
|
87% |
|
|
VEE240 |
|
11 out of |
7 out |
|
12 out |
|
95% |
|
|
13, 85% |
of 7, |
|
of 12, |
|
|
|
|
|
100% |
|
100% |
|
|
VEE250 |
|
|
|
|
15 out |
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
|
of 15, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
VTE260 |
|
|
|
6 out of |
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
7, 100% |
|
|
|
VTE261 |
|
|
|
7 out of |
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
7, 100% |
|
|
|
VTE270 |
|
|
|
6 out of |
|
|
86% |
|
|
|
|
7, 86% |
|
|
|
VTE280 |
|
|
|
6 out of |
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
6, 100% |
|
|
|
VTE281 |
|
|
5 out |
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
of 5, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100% |
|
|
|
|
Table 7. Course completion rate by semester
Source: Program instructors class record book.
6. Students’ Satisfaction Rate
The data collected and shown are the student evaluation for course instructor. It was gathered at the office of Instructional coordinator at Pohnpei campus. The data show course code and semester, evaluation criteria, general weighted average, number of student evaluator and the legend which describe the degree of rated points.
|
|
Course /Faculty/Semester |
||
Student evaluation criteria for course instructor |
||||
1. |
Keeps regular schedule every class day. |
5 |
5 |
5 |
2. |
Shows interest in the subject. |
5 |
5 |
5 |
3. |
Gives individual help as needed. |
5 |
5 |
5 |
4. |
Avails himself/herself for student conference. |
5 |
5 |
5 |
5. |
Welcomes questions, suggestions and discussion from students. |
5 |
5 |
5 |
6. |
Shows interest and respect for students. |
5 |
5 |
5 |
7. |
Helps the students in meeting individual learning needs. |
5 |
5 |
5 |
8. |
Uses classroom lab fully. |
5 |
5 |
5 |
9. |
Provides clear directions for assignment and instruction. |
5 |
5 |
5 |
10. Grades fairly and frequently. |
5 |
5 |
5 |
11. |
Makes the purpose of the course clear. |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
12. |
Talks clearly at an easy-to-follow speed. |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
13. |
Lessons are well paced with activity as well as lecture. |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
14. |
Makes the course interesting. |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
15. |
Textbooks were appropriate and helpful. |
5 |
5 |
5 |
|
General weighted average |
5 |
5 |
5 |
||
Number of students evaluator = |
7 |
4 |
4 |
||
Legend: |
|
|
|
||
5 |
= Always |
|
|
|
|
4 |
= Usually |
|
|
|
|
3 |
= Sometimes |
|
|
|
|
2 |
= Rarely |
|
|
|
|
1 |
= Never |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Course /Faculty/Semester |
|
|||||||||||
Student evaluation criteria for course instructor |
||||||||||||||||
1. |
Keeps regular schedule every class day. |
|
4.9 |
5 |
5 |
|||||||||||
2. |
Shows interest in the subject. |
|
4.9 |
5 |
5 |
|||||||||||
3. |
Gives individual help as needed. |
|
5 |
5 |
5 |
|||||||||||
4. |
Avails himself/herself for student conference. |
|
4.9 |
5 |
5 |
|||||||||||
5. |
Welcomes questions, suggestions and discussion from students. |
4.9 |
5 |
5 |
||||||||||||
6. |
Shows interest and respect for students. |
|
4.9 |
5 |
5 |
|||||||||||
7. |
Helps the students in meeting individual learning needs. |
|
4.8 |
5 |
5 |
|||||||||||
8. |
Uses classroom lab fully. |
|
4.9 |
5 |
5 |
|||||||||||
9. |
Provides clear directions for assignment and instruction. |
|
4.8 |
5 |
5 |
|||||||||||
10. |
Grades fairly and frequently. |
|
4.9 |
5 |
5 |
|||||||||||
11. |
Makes the purpose of the course clear. |
|
4.9 |
5 |
5 |
|||||||||||
12. |
Talks clearly at an easy-to-follow speed. |
|
4.9 |
5 |
5 |
|||||||||||
13. |
Lessons are well paced with activity as well as lecture. |
|
4.9 |
5 |
5 |
|||||||||||
14. |
Makes the course interesting. |
|
4.9 |
5 |
5 |
|||||||||||
15. |
Textbooks were appropriate and helpful. |
|
4.7 |
5 |
5 |
|||||||||||
General weighted average |
|
4.88 |
5 |
5 |
||||||||||||
Number of students evaluator |
|
9 |
8 |
6 |
||||||||||||
Student evaluation criteria for course instructor |
||||||||||||||||
1. |
Keeps regular schedule every class day. |
|
5 |
4.6 |
4.5 |
|||||||||||
2. |
Shows interest in the subject. |
|
4.7 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
|||||||||||
3. |
Gives individual help as needed. |
|
4.8 |
4.5 |
4.7 |
|||||||||||
4. |
Avails himself/herself for student conference. |
|
4.7 |
4.5 |
4.3 |
|||||||||||
5. |
Welcomes questions, suggestions and discussion from students. |
4.5 |
4.6 |
4.5 |
||||||||||||
6. |
Shows interest and respect for students. |
|
5 |
4.3 |
3.5 |
|||||||||||
7. |
Helps the students in meeting individual learning needs. |
|
4.6 |
4.8 |
4.6 |
|||||||||||
8. |
Uses classroom lab fully. |
|
4.9 |
4.5 |
4.3 |
|||||||||||
9. |
Provides clear directions for assignment and instruction. |
|
4.7 |
4.6 |
4.4 |
|||||||||||
10. |
Grades fairly and frequently. |
|
4.9 |
4.6 |
4.7 |
|||||||||||
11. |
Makes the purpose of the course clear. |
|
4.7 |
3.8 |
4.6 |
|||||||||||
12. |
Talks clearly at an easy-to-follow speed. |
|
4.8 |
4.5 |
4.2 |
|||||||||||
13. |
Lessons are well paced with activity as well as lecture. |
|
4.8 |
4.4 |
4.4 |
|||||||||||
14. |
Makes the course interesting. |
|
4.6 |
4.6 |
4.4 |
|||||||||||
15. |
Textbooks were appropriate and helpful. |
|
4.4 |
4.3 |
4.1 |
|||||||||||
General weighted average |
|
4.74 |
4.47 |
4.38 |
||||||||||||
Number of students evaluator |
|
14 |
9 |
17 |
||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||
4 = Usually 3 = Sometimes 2 = Rarely 1 = Never |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Course/Faculty/Semester |
|
|
|
||||||
Student evaluation criteria for course instructor |
|||||||||||
1. |
Keeps regular schedule every class day. |
5 |
4.6 |
4.9 |
4.4 |
||||||
2. |
Shows interest in the subject. |
5 |
4.5 |
5 |
4.9 |
||||||
3. |
Gives individual help as needed. |
5 |
4.8 |
5 |
4.9 |
||||||
4. |
Avails himself/herself for student conference. |
5 |
4.7 |
4.9 |
4.8 |
||||||
5. |
Welcomes questions, suggestions and discussion from students. |
5 |
4.9 |
4.8 |
4.8 |
||||||
6. |
Shows interest and respect for students. |
5 |
4.4 |
5 |
4.8 |
||||||
7. |
Helps the students in meeting individual learning needs. |
5 |
4.7 |
4.9 |
5 |
||||||
8. |
Uses classroom lab fully. |
5 |
4.8 |
4.8 |
4.9 |
||||||
9. |
Provides clear directions for assignment and instruction. |
5 |
4.8 |
4.9 |
5 |
||||||
10. |
Grades fairly and frequently. |
5 |
4.8 |
5 |
5 |
||||||
11. |
Makes the purpose of the course clear. |
5 |
4.9 |
5 |
5 |
||||||
12. |
Talks clearly at an easy-to-follow speed. |
5 |
4.5 |
4.9 |
4.9 |
||||||
13. |
Lessons are well paced with activity as well as lecture. |
5 |
4.9 |
5 |
4.9 |
||||||
14. |
Makes the course interesting. |
5 |
4.8 |
4.9 |
5 |
||||||
15. |
Textbooks were appropriate and helpful. |
5 |
4.9 |
4.8 |
4.4 |
||||||
General weighted average |
5 |
4.73 |
4.92 |
4.85 |
|||||||
Number of students evaluator |
10 |
10 |
10 |
10 |
|||||||
5 = Always 4 = Usually 3 = Sometimes 2 = Rarely
|
|
|
|
|
7. Employment Data
|
|
Name |
Degree |
Current Employer |
1. |
Gallen, Kalio |
AAS_T |
FSM Telecommunication |
|
2. |
Henry, Patrick |
AAS_T |
FSM Telecommunication |
|
3. |
Siola, Billy |
AAS_T |
FSM Telecommunication |
|
4. |
Tally, Paul |
AAS_T |
FSM Telecommunication |
|
5. |
Andres, Rudy |
AAS_E |
Ponpei Conservation |
|
6. |
Gilmete, Christopher |
AAS_E |
COM-FSM National (I.T.) |
|
7. |
Pretrick, Henry |
AAS_T |
FSM Telecommunication |
|
8. |
Wolphagen, Childen |
AAS_T |
FSM Telecommunication |
|
9. |
Arnold, Alcabone |
AAS_T |
Self employed |
|
10. |
Kihleng, Marcia |
AAS_E |
U.S. mainland |
|
11. |
Joseph, Roseann |
AAS_E |
Self employed |
|
12. |
Hadley, Herbert |
AAS_E |
U.S. Arkansas |
|
13. |
Meingin, Renson |
AAS_T |
Hawaii |
|
14. |
Penias, Taylor |
AAS_E |
Teacher in Madolenihmw |
|
15. |
Soaz, Sayse |
AAS_E |
Self employed |
|
16. |
Amor, Gene |
AAS_T |
Pohnpei State Hospital maintenance |
|
17. |
Anson, Vinson |
AAS_E |
U.S. Marine Corps |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18. |
Joel, Natahniel |
AAS_E |
Pohnpei working as accountant |
|
|
19. Lippwe, Ervin |
AAS_T |
U.S. mainland |
|
|
|
20. |
Ucherkemur, Kelulau |
AAS_E |
U.S. Army |
|
|
21. |
Gallen, Roby |
CA_E |
U.S. Marines |
|
|
22. |
Etse, Cooper |
AAS_E |
COM-FSM Pohnpei (I.T.) |
|
|
23. |
Stepehen, Hank |
AAS_E |
U.S. Mississippi (Technician) |
|
|
24. |
Johhny, Mathew |
AAS_E |
Pohnpei Computer Consultant |
|
|
25. |
Simon, Geoffrey |
AAS_E |
LEO ‘s Enterprises (I.T.) |
|
Table 8. Graduated students list Applied Associate Science in Electronics (AAS_E), Applied Associate Science in Telecommunication (AAS_T) and current employer
Source (Employer, friends and relatives interviews and surveys)
8. Transfer Rate
|
Name |
Degree |
Current School Enrolled |
1. |
Neth, Julian |
BSIT |
Mainland China |
2. |
Perman, Deatra Chrystal |
BSEE |
University of Hawaii |
3. Lippwe, Irvin |
BSECE |
Mainland U.S.A. |
|
4. |
Movick, Marie Bernadeth |
BSEE |
University of Guam |
5. |
Johnny, Sherwin |
BSCE |
University of Hawaii |
Table 9. Graduated student pursuing for bachelors degree
Source (Friends and relatives interviews and surveys)
Table 8 , show the table of students that graduate the program and their current employer. Table 9, show the transfer rate table, the list of student who completed the program and currently pursuing a higher education.
9. Programs’ Student Learning Outcomes
Program Learning Outcomes [PLOs] for both programs have been assessed from fall 08 to summer 10. Since both AAS programs utilized the Certificate of Achievement [Electronic Engineering Technology] as the first-year of the two-year AAS degree program, both programs have the same first-four PLOs as stated below:
Certificate in Electronics Engineering
PLOs for the Advanced Certificates and AAS Degree programs are listed below:
Electronics Technology
Perform troubleshooting techniques to maintain, diagnose, and repair personal computer systems.
Perform troubleshooting techniques to maintain, diagnose, and repair office equipment, and video & audio equipment and systems.
Telecommunications Technology
Summary of recommendation:
Student performance is rated by instructor using a rubric which indicates three levels of performance rating: exemplary (E), developing (D), and unacceptable (U).
Exemplary – students who passed written exams with a score of 90 or higher. And students who performed practical tasks with no or minimum assistance from instructor to successfully complete assigned tasks.
Developing – students who passed written exams with a score between 70 and 89. And students who performed practical tasks with some assistance from instructor to successfully complete assigned tasks.
Unacceptable – students who failed [60 or below] written exams and performed poorly in completing tasks or never completed tasks.
See Appendix B for electronics technology program and telecommunication technology program worksheet #2 (Program plan) and worksheet #3(Assessment report) from Fall 2008 to Spring 2011.
10. Students’ Learning Outcomes for Program Courses.
SLO for all courses in both programs are assessed as the courses are offered in each semester. Written and performance exams are embedded in mid term and final exams to assess SLO for each course.
CERTIFICATE OF ACHIEVEMENT IN ELECTRONIC ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY
VEE100 Soldering and Termination Techniques
VSP121 Industrial Safety
VEM110 Workshop Fabrication
VEE103 Electronic Fundamentals I
VEE135 Digital Electronics I
ADVANCED CERTIFICATE IN ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY
VEE222 Discrete Devices II
VEE235 Digital Electronics II
VEE235 Digital Electronics II
VEE223 PC Hardware & Software
AAS in ELECTRONIC TECHNOLOGY
VEE224 Video Systems & Product Servicing
VEE225 Business Machines Servicing
VEE240 Signal Processing
ADVANCED CERTIFICATE in TELECOMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY
VEE235 |
Digital Electronics II |
[same as above] |
VEE240 |
Signal Processing |
[same as above] |
VEE230 Radio Communications
VTE261 Fiber Optics Installation
VTE260 Microwave
VTE270 Telecommunication Systems
VTE280 Telephone Systems
See appendix A for electronics technology program and telecommunication technology program course level assessment for Fall 2008 to Spring 2011for a detailed result on the assessment for each abovementioned courses.
I.a. Discussion on findings
I.b. Recommendations
This website and all COM-FSM Internet based services are best viewed with Firefox 3.0 or better.
© Copyright 2020 College of Micronesia-FSM | Site Disclaimer
P. O. Box 159, Kolonia, Pohnpei, 96941 - (691) 320-2480
College of Micronesia-FSM is accredited by the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges,
Western Association of Schools and Colleges, 428 J Street., Suite 400 Sacramento, CA 95814, (415) 506-0234,
an institutional accrediting body recognized by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation and the U.S. Department of Education.
Additional information about accreditation, including the filing of complaints against member institutions, can be found at: www.accjc.org